Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041197›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Indore, Madhya Pradesh: A community-based cross-sectional study, August 2020.

Salil Sakalle, Satish Saroshe, Harish Shukla, Anita Mutha, Ameya Vaze, Arpit Arora, Aditya Athotra, Sudarshan Ramaswamy, Arania Jain, Meera Dhuria and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Salil SakalleMGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Satish SarosheMGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Harish ShuklaMGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Anita MuthaMGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ameya VazeDepartment of Health Service, Govt. of M.P., Madhya Pradesh, India.
Arpit AroraIndian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Aditya AthotraNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Sudarshan RamaswamyNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Arania JainBrain Above InfoSol Pvt. Ltd., Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Meera DhuriaNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Anil D PatilNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Arvind RaiNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Suneela GargMaulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Sudhir K JainNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Jyoti BindalMGM Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sujeet K SinghNational Centre for Disease Control, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, laboratory diagnosis of SARS - CoV-2 infection has been mostly based on real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Studies have shown that Viral titres peak within the first week of symptoms but may decline later hampering RT-PCR-based diagnostic strategies. Exact estimate is difficult under high-risk screening strategy with evidences of having large number of asymptomatic cases. This has prompted a call for adoption of antibody testing as potential source of data. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study with a sample size of 7000 was conducted for 15 days including all the 85 wards under Indore Municipal Corporation. Stratified Random Sampling was used to collect the samples. Trained teams collected basic sociodemographic information and serum samples which were tested for the presence of specific antibodies to COVID-19 using ICMR-Kavach IgG ELISA kits. The data collected was compiled and analysed using appropriate statistical software.

resultsOverall weighted seroprevalence of the study population was found to be 7.75%. The prevalence in males and females was comparable (7.91% vs 7.57%). Highest seropositivity (10.04%) was seen among individuals aged more than 60 years. Total number of infections in the population were estimated to be 2,03,160. Overall Case Infection Ratio was found to be 27.43.

conclusionThe current seroprevalence study provides information on proportion of the population exposed, but the correlation between presence and absence of antibodies is not a marker of total or partial immunity. It must also be noted that more than 90 percent of the population is still susceptible for COVID-19 infection. Hence, non-pharmaceutical interventions like respiratory hygiene, physical distancing, hand sanitization, usage of personal protective equipment such as masks and implementation of public health measures need to be continued.

Indexed as

Community basedIndoreinfectionSARS-CoV-2seroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID34041197
PMCPMC8140269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.