Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041190›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

A prospective cohort study of patients presenting to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Vrinda Shenoy, Sarina Shah, Sathish Kumar, Deepu David, Karthik Gunasekaran, G Priya, Bagyalakshmi Selvaraj, Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive review on the current management of upper-GI bleed.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vrinda ShenoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sarina ShahDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sathish KumarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Deepu DavidDepartment of Gastroenterology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthik GunasekaranDepartment of General Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
G PriyaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bagyalakshmi SelvarajDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar AbhilashDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christian Medical College · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is a common presentation to the Emergency Department (ED), and is associated with re-bleeding and significant mortality. Although several studies have described etiology and outcome of UGI bleeding, few have been done in the EDs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational cohort study included all patients presenting with hematemesis or melena, between June 2016 and January 2017 to the ED. Demographic data, risk factors, endoscopy findings and prognosticating scores were noted. Patients were followed up through telephonic communication after 3 months to assess re-bleeding rate and mortality.

resultsThe study cohort included 210 patients with a male predominance (76.2%). The mean (SD) age was 51 (16.8) years. They presented with either hematemesis (33.8%), melena (28.6%), or both (37.6%). One third (35.7%) had variceal bleed, 21% had peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and 43.3%bled due to other etiology. UGI scopy was performed in 85.2% of patients with banding (25.1%) and sclerotherapy (14%) being the most frequently performed procedures. Endoscopic intervention was not required in 58.6%of patients. Packed red cells were transfused in 46.7% patients. The 48-h re-bleed rate among variceal bleeders was 5.3% and 11.4% among peptic ulcer bleeders. The 3-month re-bleeding rate was 42.9% and the 3-month mortality rate was 17.5% among the variceal bleeders and the same was 5.6% and 2.8%, respectively, among the peptic ulcer bleeders. The overall mortality was 12.4%.

conclusionsVariceal bleeding and PUD were the predominant causes of UGI bleeding. Overall, a quarter of our patients had a re-bleed within 3 months, with majority being variceal bleeds.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentmortalitypeptic ulcerrebleedupper gastrointestinal bleedingvariceal

Identifiers

PMID34041190
PMCPMC8140221
OpenAlexW3155610422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.