Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041189›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

The impact of the English medical curriculum on medical history taking from Arabic speaking patients by medical students.

Muhannad A Alnahdi, Abdullah Alhaider, Fahad Bahanan, Ahmed Aldubaikhi, Abdulrahman Aljehani, Aamir Omair, Meshal Alaqeel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhannad A AlnahdiCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlhaiderCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad BahananCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed AldubaikhiCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AljehaniCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aamir OmairCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meshal AlaqeelCollege of Medicine, King Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical education in Saudi medical colleges is delivered to students through a completely English language curriculum, whereas the practice that students face in the hospital is generally conducted in Arabic language settings. We suggest that the linguistic gap between the adopted medical curriculum and actual practice could influence students' confidence and level of difficulty in history taking in Arabic. The study aimed to identify the effects of learning history taking in the English language on applying it in the medical student's native language.

methodsThis cross-sectional design study was held in the College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS). The targeted sample size was 377 medical students from the fourth to the sixth year, and stratified random sampling was used. The questionnaire used was self-developed, validated, and pilot tested in other medical colleges. The questionnaire asked about students' confidence, the difficulty of Arabic history taking, and suggested strategies to improve the current curriculum.

resultsThe response rate was 290 participants (76.9%), males were 205 (71%), and 136 (47%) were in the fourth year. Agreement on feeling confident while taking history taking in Arabic was 98 (33.8%), 102 (35.2%) were neutral, and 90 (31%) disagreed. Moreover, 138 (47.6%) of students preferred training for Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Arabic more than English, 86 (29.7%) were neutral, while 66 (22.8%) disagreed. The mean level of difficulty was 2.1 ± 0.7 (range 1- 5). Additionally, 198 (68%) of students suggested adding short Arabic history courses.

conclusionStudents considered history taking in Arabic as easy, even though they were not completely confident. Further efforts are needed to uplift students' of confidence to optimal levels. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Communication is the cornerstone of medical education as well as clinical practice. The study explores the impact of instruction language on the physician-patient communication dynamic, providing better infrastructure for evidence-based educational practice. APPLICATION TO PATIENT CARE: This study gives insight into the students' level of preparation to practice in their local community and language. Furthermore, the study addresses strategies to enhance students communication skills and alleviate linguistic barriers in the physician-patient encounter.

Indexed as

ArabicEnglish curriculumHistory takingSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID34041189
PMCPMC8140241
OpenAlexW3154825142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.