Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041112›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Quarantine practices and COVID-19 transmission in a low-resource setting: Experience of Kerala, India.

Raman Swathy Vaman, Mathew J Valamparampil, Basil Varghese, Elezebeth Mathews, Muhammed Anwar Valiyapurayilmundakundil, Ramya K Abraham, A V Ramdas, A T Manoj, T S Anish

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raman Swathy VamanDistrict Program Manager, National Health Mission, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Mathew J ValamparampilAssistant Surgeon, District Medical Office, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Basil VargheseJunior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College Kannur, Kerala, India.
Elezebeth MathewsAssistant Professor, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Muhammed Anwar ValiyapurayilmundakundilNursing Tutor, School of Nursing, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Ramya K AbrahamStaff Nurse, General Hospital Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
A V RamdasDistrict Medical Officer, District Medical Office, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
A T ManojDistrict Surveillance Officer, District Medical Office, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
T S AnishAssociate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Government Medical College · INCentral University of Kerala · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/17/1/503345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDisease transmission patterns of COVID-19 have shown that masking, social distancing, contact tracing and quarantine measures are important strategies for reducing transmission. The effective implementation of quarantine is determined by the commitment of the people and monitoring by the State. The aim of the study was to find out the effectiveness of home quarantine practises and its role in determining SARS CoV2 transmission.

methodsRecord-based retrospective cohort study was conducted among expatriates of Kerala who were on quarantine at their homes and later tested positive for SARS -CoV-2. Quarantine practises were categorised as strict room quarantine, incomplete room quarantine, home quarantine and no quarantine. Risk of transmission was assessed using risk ratios. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the determinants of SARS CoV2 transmission.

resultsThe median (IQR) age and duration of quarantine of 95 study participants were found to be 35 (29, 44) years and 7 (3,13) days, respectively. Majority of the participants practised strict room quarantine (57%), whereas 11.6%, 16.8% and 14.7% practiced incomplete room, home and no quarantine, respectively. Home quarantine without room quarantine had 24 times odds for transmitting disease [OR (95%CI)): 24.14 (4.87--119.75), DISCUSSION: Low-resource settings successful in the initial phases of COVID-19 pandemic should make periodic revisions in the quarantine guidelines while continually promoting physical distancing strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Indialow-income populationstransmission

Identifiers

PMID34041112
PMCPMC8138343
OpenAlexW3134034220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.