Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041092›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Vaccine wastage at primary, secondary, and tertiary level of healthcare system-A study from Northern India.

Simmi Oberoi, Prabhakar Mishra, Vikram K Gupta, Siriesha Patnaik, Ayushi Garg, Ravneet Kaur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simmi OberoiDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Prabhakar MishraDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vikram K GuptaDepartment of Community Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Siriesha PatnaikDepartment of Community Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Ayushi GargDepartment of Community Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Ravneet KaurDepartment of Community Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh vaccine wastage results in escalation of budget of immunization program.

objectiveTo analyze vaccine wastage at three levels of service delivery under public sector, such as at district level, community health Centre (CHC), and sub center (SC). STUDY

designA retrospective cross-sectional record based study in a north Indian state. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe record from January to June 2016 was taken from randomly selected 5 districts of the state at 3 levels; for number of doses of vaccine used and number of children vaccinated for BCG, OPV, Hepatitis B, Pentavalent, DPT, IPV, Measles, and TT (vaccines being given in state in the study year). A total of 67,550 vaccine doses in routine immunization were studied. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were presented in mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA test was used to compare the means among three levels.

resultsVaccine wastage for Pentavalent was remarkably low (4.86% at district level, 8.35% at CHC and 11.50% at SC) in contrast to other similar 10 dose vials of vaccines like DPT, TT, Hep B. For both the lyophilized vaccines, interestingly BCG wastage was not only significant but over the permissible levels at 60.39%, whereas it is not so for measles. Result indicated that mean difference of the vaccine wastage among three levels was significant for the BCG, OPV, Hepatitis B, Pentavalent, and TT (

conclusionsNot all vaccine wastage is preventable, but pruning the corners where feasible and allowing where it is desirable should depend on prioritizing stakeholders at the receiving end.

Indexed as

Immunizationpublic sectoruniversal immunization programvaccine wastage

Identifiers

PMID34041092
PMCPMC8138397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.