Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041079›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Community-based assessment of postnatal care in Puducherry-A cross-sectional study.

Ramya Selvaraj, Jayalakshmy Ramakrishnan, Swaroop Kumar Sahu, Sitanshu Sekhar Kar, Gautam Roy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramya SelvarajDepartment of Community Medicine, JIPMER, Karaikal, UT of Puducherry, India.
Jayalakshmy RamakrishnanDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Karaikal, UT of Puducherry, India.
Swaroop Kumar SahuDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Karaikal, UT of Puducherry, India.
Sitanshu Sekhar KarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Karaikal, UT of Puducherry, India.
Gautam RoyDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, JIPMER, Karaikal, UT of Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostnatal period is a neglected period compared to the antenatal period. Providing adequate care to infant and mother during this vital period is essential.

objectivesTo assess the postnatal care (PNC) received by the mothers and newborn children in Puducherry. MATERIALS AND

methodsCommunity-based cross-sectional study done among the postnatal mothers under the care of two urban Primary Health Centers (PHC A and PHC B) in Puducherry in 2015-2016. Eligible mothers were contacted at their houses within 4 weeks of completion of their postnatal period to assess the postnatal care.

resultsOut of 227 postnatal mothers in the study, only 37.4% (85) (95%CI 31.3-43.9) of the mothers had received adequate counselling services on topics of nutrition, hygiene, contraception, essential newborn care, breastfeeding, and immunization. Cord care was given for 99.1% of the babies and breastfeeding position was checked for 88.5% of the babies. Among the mothers who had normal deliveries, 48.1% (76) (95% CI 40.4-55.9) of the mothers had initiated breastfeeding within 1 h of normal delivery and within 4 h of delivery for 72.4% (50) (95% CI 61.1-82.0) among the mothers who had a cesarean section. Only 20.7% (47) (95%CI 15.8-26.3) of the mothers and newborns had received at least one postnatal home visit and none of the mothers had received adequate postnatal home visits as per Indian Public Health Standards guidelines. Out of the 126 eligible mothers for JSY benefits, only 46% (58) (95% CI 37.5-54.8) of them had registered. Among those who were not registered, 20.6% had reported that they were unaware of the scheme. Out of 227 births, 14.1% (32) of them were of low birth weight (<2.5 kg) and 1.3% (3) were of very low birth weight (<1.5 kg) category.

conclusionAlthough the antenatal care is satisfactory in the study setting, implementation of PNC needed further attention and active guidance via health system strengthening.

Indexed as

AnemiabreastfeedingLow birth weightpostnatal carepostpartumvery low birth weight

Identifiers

PMID34041079
PMCPMC8138348
OpenAlexW3133684694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.