Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34041034›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2021

Making a Cold Tumor Hot: The Role of Vaccines in the Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Stephen C Frederico, John C Hancock, Emily E S Brettschneider, Nivedita M Ratnam, Mark R Gilbert, Masaki Terabe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen C FredericoNeuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
John C HancockNeuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Emily E S BrettschneiderNeuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Nivedita M RatnamNeuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Mark R GilbertNeuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Masaki TerabeNeuro-Oncology Branch, CCR, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Immunological Analysis of Brain CancerZIABC011877 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TERABE, MASAKI · 2019 to 2025
$10.1M
Translational ImmunologyZIABC011714 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GILBERT, MARK · 2016 to 2024
$4.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of immunotherapies for the treatment of brain tumors is a topic that has garnered considerable excitement in recent years. Discoveries such as the presence of a glymphatic system and immune surveillance in the central nervous system (CNS) have shattered the theory of immune privilege and opened up the possibility of treating CNS malignancies with immunotherapies. However, despite many immunotherapy clinical trials aimed at treating glioblastoma (GBM), very few have demonstrated a significant survival benefit. Several factors for this have been identified, one of which is that GBMs are immunologically "cold," implying that the cancer does not induce a strong T cell response. It is postulated that this is why clinical trials using an immune checkpoint inhibitor alone have not demonstrated efficacy. While it is well established that anti-cancer T cell responses can be facilitated by the presentation of tumor-specific antigens to the immune system, treatment-related death of GBM cells and subsequent release of molecules have not been shown to be sufficient to evoke an anti-tumor immune response effective enough to have a significant impact. To overcome this limitation, vaccines can be used to introduce exogenous antigens at higher concentrations to the immune system to induce strong tumor antigen-specific T cell responses. In this review, we will describe vaccination strategies that are under investigation to treat GBM; categorizing them based on their target antigens, form of antigens, vehicles used, and pairing with specific adjuvants. We will review the concept of vaccine therapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, as it is hypothesized that this approach may be more effective in overcoming the immunosuppressive milieu of GBM. Clinical trial design and the need for incorporating robust immune monitoring into future studies will also be discussed here. We believe that the integration of evolving technologies of vaccine development, delivery, and immune monitoring will further enhance the role of these therapies and will likely remain an important area of investigation for future treatment strategies for GBM patients.

Indexed as

dendritic cellsglioblastomaheat shock proteinneoantigenpeptideT cellstumor antigenvaccine

Identifiers

PMID34041034
PMCPMC8141615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.