ReviewGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Cervical Cancer Surgery: Current State of Affairs.
Review in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Patient-centered valuation of minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- MicroRNA-628-5p Regulates Proliferation, Apoptosis and Invasion in Hela Cells.Iranian journal of biotechnology · 2026Article
- Case report: Vulvar metastasis after lung metastasis in cervical squamous cell carcinoma, a case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- An optimized robotic surgical technique for cervical cancer: investigating whether the use of the pulling robotic arm has better surgical outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A Novel Technique of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage after a Mersilene Tape Erosion in a Prior Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy and Transvaginal Cerclage Patient.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Easy Standardized Technique for Dissection of the Anterior Leaf of the Vesicouterine Ligament.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Comparative Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Sentinel Node Navigation and Open Surgery for Cervical Cancer.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- From Radical Hysterectomy to Radical Surgery for Deep Endometriosis.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Application of Minimally Invasive Surgery-Multidisciplinary Team in Advanced and Recurrent Gynecological Cancers: 10-Year Exploration and Practice.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- The Current Trend of Fertility Preservation in Patients with Cervical Cancer.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer surgery has a history of more than 100-years whereby it has transitioned from the open approach to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). From the era of clinical exploration and practice, minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons have never ceased to explore new frontiers in the field of gynecologic surgery. MIS has fewer postoperative complications, including reduction of treatment-related morbidity and length of hospital stay than laparotomy; this forms the mainstay of treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. However, in November 2018, the New England Journal of Medicine had published two clinical studies on cervical cancer surgery (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC]). Following these publications, laparoscopic surgery for early-stage cervical cancer has come under intense scrutiny and negative perceptions. Many studies began to explore the concept of standardized surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. In this article, we performed a review of the history of cervical cancer surgery, outlined the standardization of cervical cancer surgery, and analyzed the current state of affairs revolving around cervical cancer surgery in the post-LACC era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.