Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040838›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2019

Understanding the relationship between pet owners and their companion animals as a key context for antimicrobial resistance-related behaviours: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.

A Dickson, M Smith, F Smith, J Park, C King, K Currie, D Langdridge, M Davis, P Flowers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Familiar Outbreak of MonophasicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A DicksonSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
M SmithSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
F SmithSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
J ParkSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
C KingSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
K CurrieSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
D LangdridgeFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, England.
M DavisSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-0466
P FlowersSafeguarding Health through Infection Prevention [SHIP] Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBMonash University · AUThe Open University · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

affectionate relationshipsAnti-microbial resistancebehaviour change interventioninterpretative phenomenological analysisinterspecies behaviours

Identifiers

PMID34040838
PMCPMC8114347
OpenAlexW2915411765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.