ReviewEFORT open reviews2021
Traditional versus congruent-arc Latarjet anatomic and biomechanical perspective.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Influence of Subscapularis Muscle Split Location on Subscapularis Function After the Latarjet Procedure.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical Variations of the Modified Latarjet Procedure: A Literature Review and Video-Illustrated Surgical Technique.Cureus · 2024Review
- Size and morphology of the coracoid and glenoid in pediatric and adolescent patients: implications for Latarjet procedure.JSES international · 2023Article
- 3D MRI PD-SPACE-COR Predicting Safety Margin for Coracoid Transfer.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Recurrence of instability after Latarjet procedure: causes, results and treatment algorithm.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Comparison of two coracoid process transfer techniques on stress shielding using three-dimensional finite-element model.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The congruent-arc Latarjet (CAL) allows reconstruction of a greater percentage of glenoid bone deficit because the inferior surface of the coracoid is wider than the lateral edge of the coracoid used with the traditional Latarjet (TL).Biomechanical studies have shown higher initial fixation strength between the graft and the glenoid with the TL.In the TL, the undersurface of the coracoid, which is wider than the medial edge used with the CAL, remains in contact with the anterior edge of the glenoid, increasing the contact surface between both bones and thus facilitating bone consolidation.The shorter bone distance around the screw with the CAL is potentially less tolerant of screw-positioning error compared to the TL. Moreover, the wall of the screw tunnel is potentially more likely to fracture with the CAL due to the minimal space between the screw and the graft wall.CAL may be very difficult to perform in patients with very small coracoids such as small women or skeletally immature patients.Radius of curvature of the inferior face of the coracoid graft (used with the CAL) is similar to that of the native glenoid. This may potentially decrease contact pressure across the glenohumeral joint, avoiding degenerative changes in the long term. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.