Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040790›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2021

Reciprocity and alignment: quantifying coupling in dynamic interactions.

Guillaume Dumas, Merle T Fairhurst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Synchrony and Reciprocity in Rhythmic Interaction.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sexism in teams: Exposure to sexist comments increases emotional synchrony but eliminates its benefits for team performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Audio-visual concert performances synchronize audience's heart rates.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Interpersonal attunement in social interactions: fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guillaume DumasCHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2253-1844
Merle T FairhurstInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Bundeswehr University, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6540-5891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent accounts of social cognition focus on

Indexed as

alignmentcouplingmulti-scale dynamicsreciprocitysocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID34040790
PMCPMC8113897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.