Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040772›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021

Partial vena cava occlusion (VCO) to counteract refractory heart failure: A new era in interventional heart failure strategy.

Yasar Sattar, Monil Majmundar, Talal Almas, David Song, Waqas Ullah, Homam Moussa Pacha, Mohamed Zghouzi, Islam Y Elgendy, Fatir Murtaza, M Chadi Alraies

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Yasar SattarIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst Hospital, Queens, NY, USA.
Monil MajmundarNew York Medical College, Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA.
Talal AlmasRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
David SongIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst Hospital, Queens, NY, USA.
Waqas UllahAbington Jefferson Health, Abington, PA, USA.
Homam Moussa PachaThe University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA.
Mohamed ZghouziDetroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Islam Y ElgendyDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Fatir MurtazaGomel State Medical University, Gomel, Belarus.
M Chadi AlraiesDetroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Detroit Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USGomel State Medical University · BYNew York Medical College · USRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acute decompensated heart failure are prone to recurrent exacerbation leading to poor quality of life when they do not respond to an optimal medical regimen. Due to the lack of linear positive inotropy response to increasing preload in heart failure patients, increasing preload is associated with poor outcomes. Partial occlusion of either IVC or SVC is a proposed novel treatment that can improve cardiac function or quality of life by altering preload/pressure in heart failure (HF) patients unresponsive to diuretics.

methodsPubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), and Cochrane database we searched using the MeSH terms including "Superior vena cava occlusion," "Inferior vena cava occlusion," "Heart failure exacerbation." The inclusion criteria included studies that enrolled patients > 18 years with diagnosed NYHA II-IV HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on optimal medical treatment (OMT).

resultsThe analysis involved two studies with 14 patients; the mean age was 64.4 ± 10 and 100% males. The difference in the mean pulmonary pressures between pre-and-post VCO devices were 1.56 (95% CI 0.66-2.46, p-value = 0.006). There was no heterogeneity among the study of mean pulmonary pressures. With the use of VC occlusion devices, the mean difference in pulmonary artery systolic pressure decreased by 1.70 (95% CI 0.68-2.71, p-value = 0.001) (Fig. 1B). The heterogeneity of mean pressure was minimal 14%.

conclusionIn conclusion, VCO can help decrease pulmonary pressure that can indirectly prevent heart failure exacerbations and possibly hospitalization in this cohort of patients.

Indexed as

Heart failure with reduced ejection fractionPreload reductionVena cava occlusion

Identifiers

PMID34040772
PMCPMC8141653
OpenAlexW3160686698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.