Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040695›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biopharmaceutical research2020

Effects of Proportional Hazard Assumption on Variable Selection Methods for Censored Data.

Alvin Sheng, Sujit K Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biopharmaceutical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comment on "Lean body mass index and hypertension risk in men: a nationwide epidemiological cohort study".Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Limitations of the cox proportional hazards model and alternative approaches in metachronous recurrence research.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alvin ShengDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University.
Sujit K GhoshDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University.

Funding

Engaging, Inspiring, and Preparing the Next Generation of BiostatisticiansR25HL131490 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, DELONG, ELIZABETH R. · 2016 to 2018
$738k
NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL131490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cox proportional hazard (PH) model is widely used to determine the effects of risk factors and treatments (covariates) on survival time of subjects that might be right censored. The selection of covariates depends crucially on the specific form of the conditional hazard model, which is often assumed to be PH, Accelerated Failure time (AFT) or proportional odds (PO). However, we show that none of these semi-parametric models allow for the crossing of the survival functions and hence such strong assumptions may adversely affect the selection of variables. Moreover, the most commonly used PH assumption may also be violated when there is a delayed effect of the risk factors. Taking into account all of these modeling assumptions, this study examines the effect of the PH assumption on covariate selection when the data generating model may have non-PH. In particular, variable selection under two alternative models are explored: (i) the penalized PH model (using the elastic-net penalty) and (ii) the linear spline based hazard regression model. We apply the aforementioned models to the ACTG-175 data set and simulated data sets with survival times generated from the Weibull and log-normal distributions. We also examine the effect on covariate selection of stratifying the analysis on the off-treatment indicator.

Indexed as

AIDS trialsCrossing survival curvesHazard regressionPenalized regression

Identifiers

PMID34040695
PMCPMC8147871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.