ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2021
Dependency analysis of frequency and strength of gamma oscillations on input difference between excitatory and inhibitory neurons.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of inhibitory autapses on synchronization of inhibitory network gamma oscillations.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Cluster synchronization for controlled nodes via the dynamics of edges in complex dynamical networks.PloS one · 2023Article
- Detecting synaptic connections in neural systems using compressive sensing.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Bidirectionally Regulating Gamma Oscillations in Wilson-Cowan Model by Self-Feedback Loops: A Computational Study.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Synaptic Role in Facilitating Synchronous Theta Oscillations in a Hybrid Hippocampal Neuronal Network.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Gamma Oscillations Facilitate Effective Learning in Excitatory-Inhibitory Balanced Neural Circuits.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been found that gamma oscillations and the oscillation frequencies are regulated by the properties of external stimuli in many biology experimental researches. To unveil the underlying mechanism, firstly, we reproduced the experimental observations in an excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) neuronal network that the oscillation became stronger and moved to a higher frequency band (gamma band) with the increasing of the input difference between E/I neurons. Secondly, we found that gamma oscillation was induced by the unbalance between positive and negative synaptic currents, which was caused by the input difference between E/I neurons. When this input difference became greater, there would be a stronger gamma oscillation (i.e., a higher peak power in the power spectrum of the population activity of neurons). Further investigation revealed that the frequency dependency of gamma oscillation on the input difference between E/I neurons could be explained by the well-known mechanisms of inter-neuron-gamma (ING) and pyramidal-interneuron-gamma (PING). Finally, we derived mathematical analysis to verify the mechanism of frequency regulations and the results were consistent with the simulation results. The results of this paper provide a possible mechanism for the external stimuli-regulated gamma oscillations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.