Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040531›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Assessment of Anti-Hypertensive Drug Adherence by Serial Aldosterone-To-Renin Ratio Measurement.

Fabrizio Buffolo, Elisa Sconfienza, Jacopo Burrello, Isabel Losano, Giulio Mengozzi, Gabriella Priolo, Valeria Avataneo, Antonio D'Avolio, Franco Veglio, Franco Rabbia and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabrizio BuffoloDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Elisa SconfienzaDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Jacopo BurrelloDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Isabel LosanoDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Giulio MengozziDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Gabriella PrioloDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Valeria AvataneoLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Antonio D'AvolioLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Franco VeglioDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Franco RabbiaDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Paolo MulateroDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Silvia MonticoneDivision of Internal Medicine and Hypertension Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITOspedale Amedeo di Savoia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduced or absent compliance to anti-hypertensive treatment is a major obstacle to the achievement of blood pressure target in patients with arterial hypertension. Current available methods for therapeutic adherence assessment display low accuracy, limited applicability in clinical practice and/or high costs. We designed a prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of serial measurement of ARR to assess the therapeutic compliance to RAAS inhibitors. We prospectively enrolled 80 subjects: 40 patients with arterial hypertension and 40 normotensive controls. The ARR was evaluated at baseline and 2 and 8 week after initiation of a RAAS inhibitor in patients with hypertension, and at baseline and 2 weeks for the control group. Adherence to the prescribed therapy was confirmed by therapeutic drug monitoring. We observed a significant increase of renin levels and reduction of aldosterone levels after RAAS inhibitors initiation, with consequent reduction of ARR. Delta ARR (ΔARR), defined as relative change in ARR before and after treatment initiation, provided high accuracy for determination of therapeutic compliance, with an AUC of 0.900 at 2 weeks and 0.886 at 8 weeks. A cut-off of -48% of ΔARR provided 90% sensitivity and 75% specificity, at 2 and 8 weeks. In conclusion, the measurement of ΔARR is a powerful test, cheap and widely available to accurately identify the non-adherence to RAAS inhibitors treatment. Herein we propose the implementation of ΔARR in clinical practice through a multi-step flow-chart for the management of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure, with identification of those suspected of non-adherence, reserving therapeutic drug monitoring for non-adherence confirmation.

Indexed as

aldosteroneangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorangiotensin receptor blockeranti-hypertensive treatmentdrug adherencerenintherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34040531
PMCPMC8141919
OpenAlexW3161655009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.