Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2021

Comparative Effectiveness of Intracerebroventricular, Intrathecal, and Intranasal Routes of AAV9 Vector Administration for Genetic Therapy of Neurologic Disease in Murine Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.

Lalitha R Belur, Megan Romero, Junggu Lee, Kelly M Podetz-Pedersen, Zhenhong Nan, Maureen S Riedl, Lucy Vulchanova, Kelley F Kitto, Carolyn A Fairbanks, Karen F Kozarsky and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Therapies for Mucopolysaccharidoses.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Neurosurgical gene therapy for central nervous system diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Nonviral nanoparticle gene delivery into the CNS for neurological disorders and brain cancer applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lalitha R BelurDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Megan RomeroDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Junggu LeeDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Kelly M Podetz-PedersenDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Zhenhong NanDepartment of Neurosurgery and Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Maureen S RiedlDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Lucy VulchanovaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Kelley F KittoDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Carolyn A FairbanksDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Karen F KozarskyREGENXBIO Inc., Rockville, MD, United States.
Paul J OrchardDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
William H FreyHealthPartners Neurosciences, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, United States.
Walter C LowDepartment of Neurosurgery and Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
R Scott McIvorDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
University of Minnesota · USHealthPartners · USRegenxbio (United States) · US

Funding

THERAPY FOR HYPERAMMONEMIA WITH GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIAP01HD032652 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI WHITLEY, CHESTER B. · 1995 to 2016
$14.5M
NINDS Center Core at the University of MinnesotaP30NS062158 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ORR, HARRY T. · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
AAV Mediated Gene Transfer to the CNS for MPS IR41DK094538 · NIDDK · REGENX BIOSCIENCES, LLC · PI KOZARSKY, KAREN, MCIVOR, R. SCOTT · 2012 to 2012
$211k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD032652NIDDK NIH HHS R41 DK094538NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS062158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is an inherited metabolic disorder caused by deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-L-iduronidase (IDUA). The two current treatments [hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)], are insufficiently effective in addressing neurologic disease, in part due to the inability of lysosomal enzyme to cross the blood brain barrier. With a goal to more effectively treat neurologic disease, we have investigated the effectiveness of AAV-mediated IDUA gene delivery to the brain using several different routes of administration. Animals were treated by either direct intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection, by intrathecal (IT) infusion into the cerebrospinal fluid, or by intranasal (IN) instillation of AAV9-IDUA vector. AAV9-IDUA was administered to IDUA-deficient mice that were either immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide (CP), or immunotolerized at birth by weekly injections of human iduronidase. In animals treated by ICV or IT administration, levels of IDUA enzyme ranged from 3- to 1000-fold that of wild type levels in all parts of the microdissected brain. In animals administered vector intranasally, enzyme levels were 100-fold that of wild type in the olfactory bulb, but enzyme expression was close to wild type levels in other parts of the brain. Glycosaminoglycan levels were reduced to normal in ICV and IT treated mice, and in IN treated mice they were normalized in the olfactory bulb, or reduced in other parts of the brain. Immunohistochemical analysis showed extensive IDUA expression in all parts of the brain of ICV treated mice, while IT treated animals showed transduction that was primarily restricted to the hind brain with some sporadic labeling seen in the mid- and fore brain. At 6 months of age, animals were tested for spatial navigation, memory, and neurocognitive function in the Barnes maze; all treated animals were indistinguishable from normal heterozygous control animals, while untreated IDUA deficient animals exhibited significant learning and spatial navigation deficits. We conclude that IT and IN routes are acceptable and alternate routes of administration, respectively, of AAV vector delivery to the brain with effective IDUA expression, while all three routes of administration prevent the emergence of neurocognitive deficiency in a mouse MPS I model.

Indexed as

AAV9gene therapyIDUAintracerebroventricular administrationintranasal infusionintrathecal injectionMPS I

Identifiers

PMID34040503
PMCPMC8141728
OpenAlexW3160168050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.