Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34040347›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2021

Antifungal Efficacy and Safety of Cycloheximide as a Supplement in Optisol-GS.

Melissa Dal Pizzol, Eduarda Correa Freitas, Claudete Locatelli, Felipe Guareze, Paula Reginatto, Gabriella Machado, Alexandre Fuentefria, Diane Marinho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of ERG11 and MDR1 genes in cycloheximide and multidrug resistance in Candida species.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa Dal PizzolPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina: Ciências Cirúrgicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eduarda Correa FreitasOphthalmology Department, Hospital De Clínicas De Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Claudete LocatelliOphthalmology Department, Hospital De Clínicas De Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Felipe GuarezeOphthalmology Department, Hospital De Clínicas De Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Paula ReginattoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Gabriella MachadoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre FuentefriaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Diane MarinhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina: Ciências Cirúrgicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of fungal infection after corneal transplant has increased significantly in recent years, especially

methodsThis in vitro laboratory efficacy study measured fungal colony growth in 24 vials of Optisol-GS that were divided into 6 groups of 4 vials each, as follows: (1) MIC/2 cycloheximide, (2) MIC cycloheximide, (3) MICx5 cycloheximide, (4) MICx10 cycloheximide, from MIC values obtained for each strain, (5) unsupplemented optisol-GS as a positive control (added inoculum), and (6) unsupplemented optisol-GS as a negative control (no inoculum). In each group was added

resultsIn the efficacy study, all strains showed a reduction in fungal cell growth from the second day at all evaluated concentrations of optisol-GS supplemented with cycloheximide, even at subinhibitory concentrations (MIC/2). For

conclusionThe addition of cycloheximide to optisol-GS decreased the fungal growth, demonstrating fungicide action against

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaChondroitin SulfatesComplex MixturesCycloheximideDextransGentamicinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsChondroitin SulfatesComplex MixturesCycloheximideDextransGentamicinsOptisolcorneaeye bankinginfectionpharmacology

Identifiers

PMID34040347
PMCPMC8140884
OpenAlexW3162351137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.