ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2021
Ophthalmic Artery Flow Pattern-related Stump Pressure and Ischemic Tolerance during Balloon Test Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Very few studies have described the blood flow pattern in the ipsilateral ophthalmic artery (OphA) during internal carotid artery (ICA) balloon test occlusion performed to estimate the risk of cerebral ischemia associated with therapeutic ICA sacrifice. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ipsilateral OphA flow patterns just after ICA temporary occlusion and balloon test occlusion findings. We retrospectively reviewed 32 balloon test occlusion procedures performed at our institution between 2010 and 2019, and analyzed the OphA flow patterns and the conventional balloon test occlusion assessment items: neurological symptoms, stump pressure, stump-pressure ratio, collateral circulations, and venous phase delay. The flow patterns were categorized as type I (retrograde flow reaching the middle cerebral artery [MCA]), type II (retrograde flow to the ICA not reaching the MCA), or type III (no retrograde flow). Tolerance to balloon test occlusion was observed in 4/21 patients (19.0%), 4/6 patients (66.7%), and all five patients with types I, II, and III flows, respectively. The mean pressure ratios during balloon test occlusion in flow types I, II, and III were 35.6% ± 3.5%, 56.4% ± 6.5%, and 69.4% ± 7.1%, respectively (P <0.001). The mean stump pressures in flow types I, II, and III were 36.2 ± 3.6 mmHg, 46.6 ± 6.7 mmHg, and 66.6 ± 7.3 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.003). The mean venous phase delay in flow types I, II, and III were 0.99 ± 0.14 s, 0.25 ± 0.25 s, and 0.0 ± 0.28 s, respectively (P = 0.004). All the above variables showed significant flow-related differences. These results suggest that the OphA flow patterns may provide an additional diagnostic criterion for balloon test occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.