Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039753›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2021

Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review.

Ilgin G Arslan, Rianne M Rozendaal, Marienke van Middelkoop, Saskia A G Stitzinger, Maarten-Paul Van de Kerkhove, Vincent M I Voorbrood, Patrick J E Bindels, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Dieuwke Schiphof

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Routine-data-compatible quality indicators for the ambulatory care of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilgin G ArslanGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands i.arslan@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-6177
Rianne M RozendaalGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marienke van MiddelkoopGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia A G StitzingerGeneral Practice Pallion, Hulst, The Netherlands.
Maarten-Paul Van de KerkhoveGeneral Practice Pallion, Hulst, The Netherlands.
Vincent M I VoorbroodGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick J E BindelsGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieuwke SchiphofGeneral Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To provide an overview of quality indicators (QIs) for knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) care and to highlight differences in healthcare settings. A database search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar, OpenGrey and Prospective Trial Register, up to March 2020. Studies developing or adapting existing QI(s) for patients with osteoarthritis were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were categorised into healthcare settings. QIs from included studies were categorised into structure, process and outcome of care. Within these categories, QIs were grouped into themes (eg, physical therapy). A narrative synthesis was used to describe differences and similarities between healthcare settings. We included 20 studies with a total of 196 QIs mostly related to the process of care in different healthcare settings. Few studies included patients' perspectives. Rigorous methods for evidence synthesis to develop QIs were rarely used. Narrative analysis showed differences in QIs between healthcare settings with regard to exercise therapy, weight counselling, referral to laboratory tests and 'do not do' QIs. Differences within the same healthcare setting were identified on radiographic assessment. The heterogeneity in QIs emphasise the necessity to carefully select QIs for KHOA depending on the healthcare setting. This review provides an overview of QIs outlined to their healthcare settings to support healthcare providers and policy makers in selecting the contextually appropriate QIs to validly monitor the quality of KHOA care. We strongly recommend to review QIs against the most recent guidelines before implementing them into practice.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, HipQuality Indicators, Health CareDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareHumansProspective Studieshealth careknee osteoarthritisosteoarthritisquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID34039753
PMCPMC8164978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.