Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039654›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2021

Paediatric primary care in Germany during the early COVID-19 pandemic: the calm before the storm.

Malte Kohns Vasconcelos, Katharina Weil, Daniela Vesterling-Hörner, Mehrsad Klemm, Tarik El Scheich, Hanna Renk, Katharina Remke, Hans Martin Bosse

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Malte Kohns VasconcelosInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany malte.kohnsvasconcelos@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6207-9442
Katharina WeilDepartment for General Paediatrics, Neonatology and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Daniela Vesterling-HörnerPaediatric Practice Dr. med. Vesterling-Hörner, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mehrsad KlemmKinderärzte im Karree, Leverkusen, Germany.
Tarik El ScheichKinderärzte am Zoo, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hanna RenkDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Pulmonology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Katharina RemkeDepartment for General Paediatrics, Neonatology and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans Martin BosseDepartment for General Paediatrics, Neonatology and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7888-9434
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKlinikum Leverkusen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGlobally, the COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact on healthcare provision. The effects in primary care are understudied. This study aimed to explore changes in consultation numbers and patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify challenges for patient care.

designSurvey of paediatric primary care practices on consultation numbers and patient management changes, and semistructured interviews to identify challenges for patient care. Surveys and interviews were partially linked in an explanatory sequential design to identify patient groups perceived to be at higher risk for worse care during the pandemic.

settingIn and around Düsseldorf, a densely populated area in Western Germany. The primary care facilities are spread over an area with approximately 2 million inhabitants.

participantsPrimary care in Germany is provided through practices run by self-employed specialist physicians that are contracted to offer services to patients under public health insurance which is compulsory to the majority of the population. The sample contained 44 paediatric primary care practices in the area, the response rate was 50%.

resultsNumbers of consultations for scheduled developmental examinations remained unchanged compared with the previous year while emergency visits were strongly reduced (mean 87.3 less/week in March-May 2020 compared with 2019, median reduction 55.0%). Children dependent on developmental therapy and with chronic health conditions were identified as patient groups receiving deteriorated care. High patient numbers, including of mildly symptomatic children presenting for health certificates, in combination with increased organisational demands and expected staff outages are priority concerns for the winter.

conclusionsPrimary care paediatricians offered stable service through the early pandemic but expected strained resources for the upcoming winter. Unambiguous guidance on which children should present to primary care and who should be tested would help to allocate resources appropriately, and this guidance needs to consider age group specific issues including high prevalence of respiratory symptoms, dependency on carers and high contact rates.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseGermanyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPediatriciansPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaireschild Healthcommunity-acquired infectionsCOVID-19primary health care

Identifiers

PMID34039654
PMCPMC8159664
OpenAlexW3165179926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.