Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039587›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

The evolution of parents' beliefs about childhood cancer during diagnostic communication: a qualitative study in Guatemala.

Dylan Graetz, Silvia Rivas, Lucia Fuentes, Ana Cáceres-Serrano, Gia Ferrara, Federico Antillon-Klussmann, Monika Metzger, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Jennifer W Mack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hope in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global cancer stigma research: a U.S. National Cancer Institute workshop report.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dylan GraetzDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA dylan.graetz@stjude.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4541-6910
Silvia RivasDepartment of Palliative Care, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Lucia FuentesDepartment of Psychology, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Ana Cáceres-SerranoDepartment of Psychology, Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Gia FerraraDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Federico Antillon-KlussmannDepartment of Oncology, Universidad Francisco Marroquin Facultad de Medicina, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Monika MetzgerDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Carlos Rodriguez-GalindoDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Jennifer W MackDepartments of Pediatric Oncology and Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFatalistic cancer beliefs may contribute to delayed diagnosis and poor outcomes, including treatment abandonment, for children with cancer. This study explored Guatemalan parents' cancer beliefs during initial paediatric cancer communication, and the sociocultural and contextual factors that influence these beliefs.

methodsTwenty families of children with cancer were included in this study. We audio-recorded psychosocial conversations with psychologists and diagnostic conversations with oncologists, then conducted semi-structured interviews with parents to explore the evolution of their cancer beliefs. Audio-recordings were transcribed and translated from Spanish into English, with additional review in both languages by bilingual team members. All 60 transcripts were thematically analysed using a priori and novel codes.

resultsGuatemalan parents' beliefs evolve as they learn about cancer through various sources. Sources of information external to the cancer centre, including prior experiences with cancer, media exposure, community discussion and clinical encounters, contribute to pre-existing beliefs. Many parents' pre-existing cancer beliefs are fatalistic; some are influenced by Mayan spirituality. Sources internal to the cancer centre include psychologists and oncologists, other providers, other patients and families. Psychologists acknowledge pre-existing beliefs and deliver cancer education using verbal explanations and hand-drawings. Oncologists provide diagnostic information and outline treatment plans. Both support hope by providing a path toward cure. Parents' lived experience is a culmination of sources and simultaneously independent. Ultimately most parents arrive at an understanding of cancer that is consistent with an allopathic medical model and offers optimism about outcomes.

conclusionAn interdisciplinary communication process that includes cancer education, is attentive to pre-existing beliefs, and supports hope may encourage acceptance of the allopathic medical model and need for treatment. Providers in settings of all resource levels may be able to use these techniques to support cross-cultural cancer communication, reduce treatment abandonment and improve therapy adherence.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsChildCommunicationGuatemalaHumansParentsQualitative Researchcancerchild healthpaediatricsqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID34039587
PMCPMC8160167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.