Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039374›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Wild plants and the food-medicine continuum-an ethnobotanical survey in Chapada Diamantina (Northeastern Brazil).

Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros, Karina Ferreira Figueiredo, Paulo Henrique Santos Gonçalves, Roberta de Almeida Caetano, Élida Monique da Costa Santos, Gabriela Maria Cota Dos Santos, Déborah Monteiro Barbosa, Marcelo de Paula, Ana Maria Mapeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Edible Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patrícia Muniz de MedeirosCampus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Br 104, s/n, Mata do Rolo, Rio Largo, Alagoas, 57100-000, Brazil. patricia.medeiros@ceca.ufal.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3835-5232
Karina Ferreira FigueiredoCentro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Rua da Prainha, n 1326, Morada Nobre, Barreiras, Bahia, 47810-047, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique Santos GonçalvesCentro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Reitor Joaquim Amazonas, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-570, Brazil.
Roberta de Almeida CaetanoInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Av. Paulo Holanda, 143, Cidade Universitária, Maceió, Alagoas, 57072-900, Brazil.
Élida Monique da Costa SantosInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Av. Paulo Holanda, 143, Cidade Universitária, Maceió, Alagoas, 57072-900, Brazil.
Gabriela Maria Cota Dos SantosInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Av. Paulo Holanda, 143, Cidade Universitária, Maceió, Alagoas, 57072-900, Brazil.
Déborah Monteiro BarbosaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Av. Paulo Holanda, 143, Cidade Universitária, Maceió, Alagoas, 57072-900, Brazil.
Marcelo de PaulaCentro das Ciências Exatas e das Tecnologias, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Rua da Prainha, n 1326, Morada Nobre, Barreiras, Bahia, 47810-047, Brazil.
Ana Maria MapeliCentro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Rua da Prainha, n 1326, Morada Nobre, Barreiras, Bahia, 47810-047, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302786/2016-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthnobotanical research has demonstrated that several wild food plants (WFP) are used for medicinal purposes. Therefore, in addition to constituting an important source of nutrients, WFP can be used to help treat and avoid health problems. This study sought to characterize the traditional use of plants considered simultaneously as food and medicine by local specialists in the community of Caeté-Açu, which borders Chapada Diamantina National Park (NE Brazil). We also sought to identify the variables that influence the species' cultural importance.

methodsWe selected local specialists based on a snowball sample and used a free-listing technique to register the wild plants they knew that are both edible and medicinal. Then, we asked the specialists to rank each plant component cited according to the following attributes: (1) ease of acquisition, (2) taste, (3) smell, (4) nutritional value, and (5) medicinal value. We used multiple regression to determine the variables that influence the cultural salience.

resultsThe most culturally salient species was Anredera cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis. The main medicinal effects associated with this species were related to body strengthening, intestinal regulation, and stomach issues. The most salient used species were those that were easiest to acquire and had the highest perceived nutritional values.

conclusionIt is likely that the sociocultural backgrounds of the respondents (elders, former miners, or descendants of miners) and the historical importance of wild food plants to local diets increased the predictive power of the perceived nutritional importance and ease of acquisition of these plants.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyPlants, MedicinalBrazilPhytotherapyPlants, EdibleSurveys and QuestionnairesEthnobotanyFunctional foodsSelection criteriaTraditional knowledgeWild edible plants

Identifiers

PMID34039374
PMCPMC8157413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.