Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039368›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis.

Leah Kenny, Rahma Hassan, Loraine J Bacchus, Matthew Smith, Bettina Shell-Duncan, Nana Apenem Dagadu, Angela Muriuki, Abdullahi Hussein Aden, Ibrahim Abdirizak Jelle, Beniamino Cislaghi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leah KennyFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Saint Pancras, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. l.j.kenny@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-1276
Rahma HassanInstitute for Development Studies, University of Nairobi, 4 Harry Thuku Rd, Nairobi, Kenya.
Loraine J BacchusFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Saint Pancras, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Matthew SmithThe Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, EH14 1DJ, UK.
Bettina Shell-DuncanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Washington, 314 Denny Hall, Box 353100, Seattle, WA, 98195-3100, USA.
Nana Apenem DagaduSave the Children US, 899 North Capitol St NE, Suite 900, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Angela MuriukiSave the Children Kenya, Matundu Close, Off School Lane, Westlands, P.O. Box 39664-00623, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abdullahi Hussein AdenSave the Children Kenya, Matundu Close, Off School Lane, Westlands, P.O. Box 39664-00623, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ibrahim Abdirizak JelleSave the Children Kenya, Matundu Close, Off School Lane, Westlands, P.O. Box 39664-00623, Nairobi, Kenya.
Beniamino Cislaghi *Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Saint Pancras, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Mazeda Hossain *Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Saint Pancras, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo our knowledge, no studies exist on the influence of nomadic pastoralist women's networks on their reproductive and sexual health (RSH), including uptake of modern family planning (FP).

methodsUsing name generator questions, we carried out qualitative egocentric social network analysis (SNA) to explore the networks of four women. Networks were analyzed in R, visuals created in Visone and a framework approach used for the qualitative data.

resultsWomen named 10-12 individuals. Husbands were key in RSH decisions and never supported modern FP use. Women were unsure who supported their use of modern FP and we found evidence for a norm against it within their networks.

conclusionsEgocentric SNA proves valuable to exploring RSH reference groups, particularly where there exists little prior research. Pastoralist women's networks likely change as a result of migration and conflict; however, husbands make RSH decisions and mothers and female neighbors provide key support in broader RSH issues. Interventions to increase awareness of modern FP should engage with women's wider networks.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorDecision MakingReproductive HealthSocial Network AnalysisAgedChildFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKenyaMaleSexual HealthSocial NormsTransients and MigrantsFamily planningNomadic pastoralistReproductive healthSocial networkSocial norms

Identifiers

PMID34039368
PMCPMC8157425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.