Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039361›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Comparative efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for the management of osteosarcomas-a multicentre retrospective study.

Meitao Xu, Ming Xu, Shuai Zhang, Hanqing Li, A I Qiuchi, Xiuchun Yu, Xu Quan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Meitao Xu *Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-5111
Ming Xu *Department of Orthopaedics, The 960th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-8651
Shuai ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9818-7760
Hanqing LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5209-725X
A I QiuchiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-5222
Xiuchun YuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The 960th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Jinan, China. 13969132190@163.com.
Xu Quan WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. wangxq65@sina.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-160X
Army Medical University · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiologic bone reconstruction in limb salvage surgery for the treatment of malignant bone tumours has always been controversial. The various inactivation methods, their convenience and stability, the curative effects elicited and associated costs all need to be considered. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated reimplantation with alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for limb salvage surgery in patients with osteosarcoma.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 28 patients with osteosarcoma, 14 patients treated with intraoperative cobalt 60 irradiation and reimplantation (group A), and 14 patients treated by alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation (group B). The postoperative complications and clinical efficacy of each treatment method were compared by statistical analysis.

resultsThe local recurrence rate was 14.3% in each group. Complete bony union was achieved in 64.3% of patients in group A and 71.4% of patients in group B. The overall 5-year survival rate was 71.4% in group A and 78.6% in group B. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 25.33 ± 4.72 (range 15-30) in group A and 24.00 ± 5.85 (range 15-30) in group B, and the mean International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) score was 25.79 ± 5.13 (range 20-36) in group A and 26.14 ± 5.33 (range 20-30) in group B. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. The results showed that the long-term clinical efficacy did not differ significantly between the two methods.

conclusionsIn limb salvage surgery for osteosarcoma, intraoperative extracorporeal irradiation and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation yielded equivalent outcomes. The alcohol-inactivated method may be a much more convenient and inexpensive way to reconstruct bone defects. Additional studies as well as more case studies are needed to fully evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment method.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAutograftsBone TransplantationHumansLimb SalvagePrognosisReplantationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAlcohol-inactivatedBone defectsCobalt-irritatedOsteosarcomaReimplantation

Identifiers

PMID34039361
PMCPMC8157677
OpenAlexW3121966455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.