Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039358›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

mHAT app for automated malaria rapid test result analysis and aggregation: a pilot study.

Carson Moore, Thomas Scherr, Japhet Matoba, Caison Sing'anga, Mukuma Lubinda, Phil Thuma, David Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carson Moore *Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, 1234 Stevenson Center Lane, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Thomas Scherr *Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, 1234 Stevenson Center Lane, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. Thomas.F.Scherr@Vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-535X
Japhet MatobaMacha Research Trust, Choma District, Zambia.
Caison Sing'angaMacha Research Trust, Choma District, Zambia.
Mukuma LubindaMacha Research Trust, Choma District, Zambia.
Phil ThumaMacha Research Trust, Choma District, Zambia.
David WrightDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, 1234 Stevenson Center Lane, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.

Funding

Mobile Health and Treat (mHAT) for Malaria EliminationR21TW010635 · FIC · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, DAVID W · 2017 to 2018
$376k
Burroughs Wellcome Fund Scherr, 2016FIC NIH HHS 1R21TW010635FIC NIH HHS R21 TW010635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are a variety of approaches being used for malaria surveillance. While active and reactive case detection have been successful in localized areas of low transmission, concerns over scalability and sustainability keep the approaches from being widely accepted. Mobile health interventions are poised to address these shortcomings by automating and standardizing portions of the surveillance process. In this study, common challenges associated with current data aggregation methods have been quantified, and a web-based mobile phone application is presented to reduce the burden of reporting rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results in low-resource settings.

methodsDe-identified completed RDTs were collected at 14 rural health clinics as part of a malaria epidemiology study at Macha Research Trust, Macha, Zambia. Tests were imaged using the mHAT web application. Signal intensity was measured and a binary result was provided. App performance was validated by: (1) comparative limits of detection, investigated against currently used laboratory lateral flow assay readers; and, (2) receiver operating characteristic analysis comparing the application against visual inspection of RDTs by an expert. Secondary investigations included analysis of time-to-aggregation and data consistency within the existing surveillance structures established by Macha Research Trust.

resultsWhen compared to visual analysis, the mHAT app performed with 91.9% sensitivity (CI 78.7, 97.2) and specificity was 91.4% (CI 77.6, 97.0) regardless of device operating system. Additionally, an analysis of surveillance data from January 2017 through mid-February 2019 showed that while the majority of the data packets from satellite clinics contained correct data, 36% of data points required correction by verification teams. Between November 2018 and mid-February 2019, it was also found that 44.8% of data was received after the expected submission date, although most (65.1%) reports were received within 2 days.

conclusionsOverall, the mHAT mobile app was observed to be sensitive and specific when compared to both currently available benchtop lateral flow readers and visual inspection. The additional benefit of automating and standardizing LFA data collection and aggregation poses a vital improvement for low-resource health facilities and could increase the accuracy and speed of data reporting in surveillance campaigns.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsData CollectionDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMalariaPilot ProjectsRural Health ServicesZambiaApplication developmentMalariaMobile healthRapid diagnostic test

Identifiers

PMID34039358
PMCPMC8153521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.