Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039354›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2021

The m

Ya-Ping Yen, Jun-An Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. cGAS-STING as a Neuroimmune Traffic Molecule: Unraveling Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential in Neurological Disorders.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. FTO-mediated mActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. MATR3 regulates METTL3-Mediated mJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2026
    Article
  11. Integrated genetic analysis reveals synaptic mFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. RNA modification systems as therapeutic targets.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. MNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ya-Ping YenInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. yapingyen@gate.sinica.edu.tw.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2264-8126
Jun-An ChenInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. jachen@imb.sinica.edu.tw.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-3203

Funding

Academia Sinica AS-GC-109-03Academia Sinica CDA-107-L05Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 109-2314-B-001-010-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 109-2326-B-001-017-National Health Research Institutes NHRI-EX110-10831NI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticTranscriptomeAdenosineAnimalsHumansMiceNerve DegenerationNeurogenesisAdenosineN-methyladenosineEpitranscriptomem6ANeural developmentNeurodegenerationRNA

Identifiers

PMID34039354
PMCPMC8157406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.