Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039337›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Comparing perspectives: patients' and health care professionals' views on spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care - a qualitative study.

Joël Perrin, Nina Streeck, Rahel Naef, Michael Rufer, Simon Peng-Keller, Horst Rettke

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03679871 (Spiritual Assessment in Chronic Pain Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03679871 nacompletednot on this map

Spiritual Assessment in Chronic Pain Patients: Construction and Validation of a Screening Tool in Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2018 to 2019Enrolled225ConditionsChronic Pain, SpiritualityArmsQuestionnaire validation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. "We Don't Normally Go Down This Avenue; This Is Normally Taboo": Using Co-Design to Develop a Training Intervention for Spiritual Health in Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Spiritual Aspect of Pain: An Integrative Review.Journal of religion and health · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joël PerrinUniversity Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. joel.perrin@uzh.ch.
Nina StreeckUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael RuferDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simon Peng-KellerFaculty of Theology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Horst RettkeCentre for Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe spiritual aspect of care is an often neglected resource in pain therapies. The aim of this study is to identify commonalities and differences in chronic pain patients' (CPP) and health care professionals' (HCP) perceptions on the integration of spiritual care into multimodal pain therapy.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative exploratory study with 42 CPPs and 34 HCPs who were interviewed in 12 separate groups in five study centres specialising in chronic pain within German-speaking Switzerland. The interviews were transcribed and subjected to a qualitative content analysis. Findings were generated by juxtaposing and analysing the statements of (a) HCP about HCP, (b) HCP about CPP, (c) CPP about HCP, and (d) CPP about CPP.

resultsViews on spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care can be described in three distinct dimensions: function (evaluating the need / request to discuss spiritual issues), structure (evaluating when / how to discuss spiritual issues) and context (evaluating why / under which circumstances to discuss spiritual issues). CPPs stress the importance of HCPs recognizing their overall human integrity, including the spiritual dimension, and would like to grant spiritual concerns greater significance in their therapy. HCPs express difficulties in addressing and discussing spiritual concerns and needs with chronic pain patients. Both parties want clarification of the context in which the spiritual dimension could be integrated into treatment. They see a need for greater awareness and training of HCPs in how the spiritual dimension in therapeutic interactions might be addressed.

conclusionsAlthough there are similarities in the perspectives of HCPs and CPPs regarding spiritual concerns and needs in chronic pain care, there are relevant differences between the two groups. This might contribute to the neglect of the spiritual dimension in the treatment of chronic pain.

trial registrationThis study was part of a larger research project, registered in a primary (clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03679871 ) and local (kofam.ch: SNCTP000003086 ) clinical trial registry.

Indexed as

Chronic PainAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansSpiritualitySwitzerlandChronic painHealth personnelPatientsQualitative researchSpirituality

Identifiers

PMID34039337
PMCPMC8152324
OpenAlexW3164130478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.