Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039327›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Medical students' preclinical service-learning experience and its effects on empathy in clinical training.

Yi-Sheng Yang, Pei-Chin Liu, Yung Kai Lin, Chia-Der Lin, Der-Yuan Chen, Blossom Yen-Ju Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of Patient Education Formats on Treatment Adherence and Denture Hygiene in Edentulous Patients: A Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi-Sheng YangDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Pei-Chin LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yung Kai LinDepartment of Surgery, Chiayi Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chia-Der LinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Der-Yuan ChenRheumatology and Immunology Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Blossom Yen-Ju LinDepartment of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No.259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City, 33302, Taiwan, Republic of China. yenju1115@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundService learning (SL) is an educational methodology presumed to help medical students be more empathetic and compassionate. We longitudinally investigated the level of empathy in medical students and how preclinical SL experience was related to their level of empathy in their clinical clerkships.

methodsOur cohort comprised fifth-year medical students engaged in clerkships as part of a 7-year medical programme at one medical school in Taiwan. Surveys were conducted at the beginning of the clerkship in September 2015 (T1) to collect data on the medical students' preclinical SL experience in curriculum-based service teams (CBSTs) and extracurricular service teams (ECSTs) and their SL self-efficacy, demographic characteristics, and empathy level. Subsequently, three follow-up surveys were conducted once every 3 months to determine the empathy level of the students during their clinical clerkships (T2-T4). Seventy students who returned the written informed consent and completed the baseline (T1) and two or more follow-up surveys (T2-T4) were included in our analysis with the response rate of 34%. In total, 247 responses across the 1-year clerkship were analysed. Descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and generalised estimating equations were employed.

resultsOur study revealed that changes in empathy level in the dimensions of perspective taking, compassionate care, and standing in patients' shoes in their clinical clerkships. Relative to that at T1, their empathy decreased in perspective taking and compassionate care at T2-T4 but increased in standing in patients' shoes at T3. Additionally, our study verified the positive effect of medical students' preclinical SL experience in CBSTs and ECSTs on empathy in terms of compassionate care and perspective taking, respectively, but not on that of standing in patients' shoes.

conclusionsSeparate investigations into subconstructs of empathy, such as perspective taking, compassionate care, and standing in patients' shoes, in medical students may be necessary for exploring the various driving forces or barriers to developing empathy in medical students. Moreover, SL experience through both CBSTs and ECSTs at medical academies may have positive effects on medical students' empathy in their clinical clerkships and should be promoted at medical schools.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipStudents, MedicalCurriculumEmpathyHumansTaiwanClerkshipsClinical trainingCurriculum-based service teamEmpathyExtracurricular service teamService learning

Identifiers

PMID34039327
PMCPMC8157642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.