Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039264›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Evaluating the accuracy of Listeria monocytogenes assemblies from quasimetagenomic samples using long and short reads.

Seth Commichaux, Kiran Javkar, Padmini Ramachandran, Niranjan Nagarajan, Denis Bertrand, Yi Chen, Elizabeth Reed, Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona, Errol Strain, Hugh Rand and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting Antibiotic Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Saprophytic Lifestyle ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Seth Commichaux *Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, USA. Seth.Commichaux@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2162-4205
Kiran Javkar *Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Padmini RamachandranCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Niranjan NagarajanComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 13862, Singapore.
Denis BertrandComputational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, 13862, Singapore.
Yi ChenCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Elizabeth ReedCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Narjol Gonzalez-EscalonaCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Errol StrainCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, USA.
Hugh RandCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Mihai PopDepartment of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Andrea OttesenCenter for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-7943
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USGenome Institute of Singapore · SGCenter for Veterinary Medicine · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

FDA HHS U01 FD001418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole genome sequencing of cultured pathogens is the state of the art public health response for the bioinformatic source tracking of illness outbreaks. Quasimetagenomics can substantially reduce the amount of culturing needed before a high quality genome can be recovered. Highly accurate short read data is analyzed for single nucleotide polymorphisms and multi-locus sequence types to differentiate strains but cannot span many genomic repeats, resulting in highly fragmented assemblies. Long reads can span repeats, resulting in much more contiguous assemblies, but have lower accuracy than short reads.

resultsWe evaluated the accuracy of Listeria monocytogenes assemblies from enrichments (quasimetagenomes) of naturally-contaminated ice cream using long read (Oxford Nanopore) and short read (Illumina) sequencing data. Accuracy of ten assembly approaches, over a range of sequencing depths, was evaluated by comparing sequence similarity of genes in assemblies to a complete reference genome. Long read assemblies reconstructed a circularized genome as well as a 71 kbp plasmid after 24 h of enrichment; however, high error rates prevented high fidelity gene assembly, even at 150X depth of coverage. Short read assemblies accurately reconstructed the core genes after 28 h of enrichment but produced highly fragmented genomes. Hybrid approaches demonstrated promising results but had biases based upon the initial assembly strategy. Short read assemblies scaffolded with long reads accurately assembled the core genes after just 24 h of enrichment, but were highly fragmented. Long read assemblies polished with short reads reconstructed a circularized genome and plasmid and assembled all the genes after 24 h enrichment but with less fidelity for the core genes than the short read assemblies.

conclusionThe integration of long and short read sequencing of quasimetagenomes expedited the reconstruction of a high quality pathogen genome compared to either platform alone. A new and more complete level of information about genome structure, gene order and mobile elements can be added to the public health response by incorporating long read analyses with the standard short read WGS outbreak response.

Indexed as

Listeria monocytogenesNanoporesGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome SequencingAssemblyListeriaMetagenomicsNanoporeQuasimetagenomicsSource tracking

Identifiers

PMID34039264
PMCPMC8157722
OpenAlexW3164240173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.