Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34039012›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Effect of Maternal Prepregnancy/Early-Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Pregnancy Smoking and Alcohol on Congenital Heart Diseases: A Parental Negative Control Study.

Kurt Taylor, Ahmed Elhakeem, Johanna Lucia Thorbjørnsrud Nader, Tiffany C Yang, Elena Isaevska, Lorenzo Richiardi, Tanja Vrijkotte, Angela Pinot de Moira, Deirdre M Murray, Daragh Finn and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Maternal Immune Activation: Implications for Congenital Heart Defects.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Kurt TaylorPopulation Health Science Bristol Medical School Bristol United Kingdom.
Ahmed ElhakeemPopulation Health Science Bristol Medical School Bristol United Kingdom.
Johanna Lucia Thorbjørnsrud NaderDivision of Health Data and Digitalisation Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway.
Tiffany C YangBradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust Bradford United Kingdom.
Elena IsaevskaCancer Epidemiology Unit Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin and CPO Piemonte Turin Italy.
Lorenzo RichiardiCancer Epidemiology Unit Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin and CPO Piemonte Turin Italy.
Tanja VrijkotteDepartment of Public and Occupational Health Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam University Medical CenterUniversity of Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Angela Pinot de MoiraSection for Epidemiology Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Denmark.
Deirdre M MurrayThe Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research University College Cork Cork Ireland.
Daragh FinnThe Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research University College Cork Cork Ireland.
Dan MasonBradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust Bradford United Kingdom.
John WrightBradford Institute for Health ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust Bradford United Kingdom.
Sam OddieCentre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York Heslington York United Kingdom.
Nel RoeleveldDepartment for Health Evidence Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands.
Jennifer R HarrisDivision of Health Data and Digitalisation Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway.
Anne-Marie Nybo AndersenSection for Epidemiology Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Denmark.
Massimo CaputoTranslational Science Bristol Medical School Bristol United Kingdom.
Deborah A LawlorPopulation Health Science Bristol Medical School Bristol United Kingdom.
At Bristol · GBNational Health Service · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKKleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) · GBPublic Health Service of Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Metabolomic and Epigenomic Mechanisms in Developmental Overnutrition.R01DK103246 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL · PI LAWLOR, DEBORAH ANNE · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
British Heart Foundation AA/18/7/34219British Heart Foundation CH/1/32804British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804British Heart Foundation CH/F/20/90003British Heart Foundation CS/16/4/32482British Heart Foundation FS/17/60/33474British Heart Foundation PG/15/33/31394Department of Health NF‐0616‐10102Department of Health NIHR200166Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_PC_21038Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6Medical Research Council MR/N024397/1NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103246Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 217065/Z/19/Wellcome Trust WT101597MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the most common congenital anomaly. The causes of CHDs are largely unknown. Higher prenatal body mass index (BMI), smoking, and alcohol consumption are associated with increased risk of CHDs. Whether these are causal is unclear. Methods and Results Seven European birth cohorts, including 232 390 offspring (2469 CHD cases [1.1%]), were included. We applied negative exposure paternal control analyses to explore the intrauterine effects of maternal BMI, smoking, and alcohol consumption during pregnancy, on offspring CHDs and CHD severity. We used logistic regression, adjusting for confounders and the other parent's exposure and combined estimates using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. In adjusted analyses, maternal overweight (odds ratio [OR], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.01-1.31]) and obesity (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.93-1.36]), compared with normal weight, were associated with higher odds of CHD, but there was no clear evidence of a linear increase in odds across the whole BMI distribution. Associations of paternal overweight, obesity, and mean BMI were similar to the maternal associations. Maternal pregnancy smoking was associated with higher odds of CHD (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.97-1.25]) but paternal smoking was not (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.85-1.07]). The positive association with maternal smoking appeared to be driven by nonsevere CHD cases (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.04-1.44]). Associations with maternal moderate/heavy pregnancy alcohol consumption were imprecisely estimated (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.52-2.58]) and similar to those for paternal consumption. Conclusions We found evidence of an intrauterine effect for maternal smoking on offspring CHDs, but no evidence for higher maternal BMI or alcohol consumption. Our findings provide further support for the importance of smoking cessation during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultAlcohol DrinkingEuropeFathersFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIncidenceMaleMothersPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk FactorsSmokingcongenital heart diseasenegative controlrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34039012
PMCPMC8483540
OpenAlexW3164317221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.