Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038603›Full record

ArticleRapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM2025

Validation of ion mobility spectrometry - mass spectrometry as a screening tool to identify type II kinase inhibitors of FGFR1 kinase.

Helen S Beeston, Tobias Klein, Richard A Norman, Julie A Tucker, Malcolm Anderson, Alison E Ashcroft, Geoffrey A Holdgate

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen S BeestonAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology & Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Tobias KleinDiscovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.
Richard A NormanDiscovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-3931
Julie A TuckerDiscovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-676X
Malcolm AndersonDiscovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.
Alison E AshcroftAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology & Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1676-123X
Geoffrey A HoldgateDiscovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of Leeds P3University of Leeds P5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe protein kinase FGFR1 regulates cellular processes in human development. As over-activity of FGFR1 is implicated with cancer, effective inhibitors are in demand. Type I inhibitors, which bind to the active form of FGFR1, are less effective than type II inhibitors, which bind to the inactive form. Screening to distinguish between type I and type II inhibitors is required.

methodsX-ray crystallography was used to indicate whether a range of potential inhibitors bind to the active or inactive FGFR1 kinase conformation. The binding affinity of each ligand to FGFR1 was measured using biochemical methods. Electrospray ionisation - ion mobility spectrometry - mass spectrometry (ESI-IMS-MS) in conjunction with collision-induced protein unfolding generated a conformational profile of each FGFR1-ligand complex. The results indicate that the protein's conformational profile depends on whether the inhibitor is type I or type II.

resultsX-ray crystallography confirmed which of the kinase inhibitors bind to the active or inactive form of FGFR1 kinase. Collision-induced unfolding combined with ESI-IMS-MS showed distinct differences in the FGFR1 folding landscape for type I and type II inhibitors. Biochemical studies indicated a similar range of FGFR1 affinities for both types of inhibitors, thus providing confidence that the conformational variations detected using ESI-IMS-MS can be interpretated unequivocally and that this is an effective screening method.

conclusionsA robust ESI-IMS-MS method has been implemented to distinguish between the binding mode of type I and type II inhibitors by monitoring the conformational unfolding profile of FGFR1. This rapid method requires low sample concentrations and could be used as a high-throughput screening technique for the characterisation of novel kinase inhibitors.

Indexed as

Ion Mobility SpectrometryProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationCrystallography, X-RayDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationFGFR1 protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1

Identifiers

PMID34038603
PMCPMC12062780
OpenAlexW3165752852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.