Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038555›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

NetGO 2.0: improving large-scale protein function prediction with massive sequence, text, domain, family and network information.

Shuwei Yao, Ronghui You, Shaojun Wang, Yi Xiong, Xiaodi Huang, Shanfeng Zhu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence Powers Protein Functional Annotation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. SPACE: STRING proteins as complementary embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Machine Learning for Protein Function Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuwei YaoSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ronghui YouSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shaojun WangInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-8911
Yi XiongDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Xiaodi HuangSchool of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
Shanfeng ZhuInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6067-5312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the explosive growth of protein sequences, large-scale automated protein function prediction (AFP) is becoming challenging. A protein is usually associated with dozens of gene ontology (GO) terms. Therefore, AFP is regarded as a problem of large-scale multi-label classification. Under the learning to rank (LTR) framework, our previous NetGO tool integrated massive networks and multi-type information about protein sequences to achieve good performance by dealing with all possible GO terms (>44 000). In this work, we propose the updated version as NetGO 2.0, which further improves the performance of large-scale AFP. NetGO 2.0 also incorporates literature information by logistic regression and deep sequence information by recurrent neural network (RNN) into the framework. We generate datasets following the critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA) protocol. Experiment results show that NetGO 2.0 outperformed NetGO significantly in biological process ontology (BPO) and cellular component ontology (CCO). In particular, NetGO 2.0 achieved a 12.6% improvement over NetGO in terms of area under precision-recall curve (AUPR) in BPO and around 2.6% in terms of $\mathbf {F_{max}}$ in CCO. These results demonstrate the benefits of incorporating text and deep sequence information for the functional annotation of BPO and CCO. The NetGO 2.0 web server is freely available at http://issubmission.sjtu.edu.cn/ng2/.

Indexed as

SoftwareCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCCAAT-Binding FactorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeural Networks, ComputerProtein DomainsProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCCAAT-Binding FactorProteins

Identifiers

PMID34038555
PMCPMC8262706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.