Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038501›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Generative Adversarial Network Based Automatic Segmentation of Corneal Subbasal Nerves on In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images.

Erdost Yildiz, Abdullah Taha Arslan, Ayse Yildiz Tas, Ali Faik Acer, Sertaç Demir, Afsun Sahin, Duygun Erol Barkana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erdost YildizKoç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah Taha ArslanTechy Bilişim Ltd., Eskişehir, Turkey.
Ayse Yildiz TasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Faik AcerKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sertaç DemirTechy Bilişim Ltd., Eskişehir, Turkey.
Afsun SahinKoç University Research Center for Translational Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Duygun Erol BarkanaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Koç University · TREskişehir City Hospital · TRYeditepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a noninvasive, reproducible, and inexpensive diagnostic tool for corneal diseases. However, widespread and effortless image acquisition in IVCM creates serious image analysis workloads on ophthalmologists, and neural networks could solve this problem quickly. We have produced a novel deep learning algorithm based on generative adversarial networks (GANs), and we compare its accuracy for automatic segmentation of subbasal nerves in IVCM images with a fully convolutional neural network (U-Net) based method. Methods: We have collected IVCM images from 85 subjects. U-Net and GAN-based image segmentation methods were trained and tested under the supervision of three clinicians for the segmentation of corneal subbasal nerves. Nerve segmentation results for GAN and U-Net-based methods were compared with the clinicians by using Pearson's R correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) statistics. Additionally, different noises were applied on IVCM images to evaluate the performances of the algorithms with noises of biomedical imaging. Results: The GAN-based algorithm demonstrated similar correlation and Bland-Altman analysis results with U-Net. The GAN-based method showed significantly higher accuracy compared to U-Net in ROC curves. Additionally, the performance of the U-Net deteriorated significantly with different noises, especially in speckle noise, compared to GAN. Conclusions: This study is the first application of GAN-based algorithms on IVCM images. The GAN-based algorithms demonstrated higher accuracy than U-Net for automatic corneal nerve segmentation in IVCM images, in patient-acquired images and noise applied images. This GAN-based segmentation method can be used as a facilitating diagnostic tool in ophthalmology clinics. Translational Relevance: Generative adversarial networks are emerging deep learning models for medical image processing, which could be important clinical tools for rapid segmentation and analysis of corneal subbasal nerves in IVCM images.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsCorneaHumansMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID34038501
PMCPMC8161698
OpenAlexW3165490920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.