Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038439›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Perceptions of family planning services and its key barriers among adolescents and young people in Eastern Nepal: A qualitative study.

Navin Bhatt, Bandana Bhatt, Bandana Neupane, Ashmita Karki, Tribhuwan Bhatta, Jeevan Thapa, Lila Bahadur Basnet, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Navin BhattB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-373X
Bandana BhattDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bandana NeupaneNepal Health Sector Support Programme (NHSSP)/DFID/Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-0041-3166
Ashmita KarkiCentral Department of Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tribhuwan BhattaDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Jeevan ThapaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5101-9460
Lila Bahadur BasnetSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Shyam Sundar BudhathokiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8614-1087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFamily planning methods are used to promote safer sexual practices, reduce unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortion, and control population. Young people aged 15-24 years belong to a key reproductive age group. However, little is known about their engagement with the family planning services in Nepal. Our study aimed to identify the perceptions of and barriers to the use of family planning among youth in Nepal.

methodsA qualitative explorative study was done among adolescents and young people aged 15-24 years from the Hattimuda village in eastern Nepal. Six focus group discussions and 25 in-depth interviews were conducted with both male and female participants in the community using a maximum variation sampling method. Data were analyzed using a thematic framework approach.

resultsMany individuals were aware that family planning measures postpone pregnancy. However, some young participants were not fully aware of the available family planning services. Some married couples who preferred 'birth spacing' received negative judgments from their family members for not starting a family. The perceived barriers to the use of family planning included lack of knowledge about family planning use, fear of side effects of modern family planning methods, lack of access/affordability due to familial and religious beliefs/myths/misconceptions. On an individual level, some couples' timid nature also negatively influenced the uptake of family planning measures.

conclusionWomen predominantly take the responsibility for using family planning measures in male-dominated decision-making societies. Moreover, young men feel that the current family planning programs have very little space for men to engage even if they were willing to participate. Communication in the community and in between the couples seem to be influenced by the presence of strong societal and cultural norms and practices. These practices seem to affect family planning related teaching at schools as well. This research shows that both young men and women are keen on getting involved with initiatives and campaigns for supporting local governments in strengthening the family planning programs in Nepal.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansMaleNepalPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34038439
PMCPMC8153486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.