Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038416›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A standardised classification scheme for the Mid-Holocene Toalean artefacts of South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Yinika L Perston, Mark Moore, Suryatman, Michelle Langley, Budianto Hakim, Adhi Agus Oktaviana, Adam Brumm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pigs as Pets: Early Human Relations with the Sulawesi Warty Pig (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinika L PerstonAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8043-6466
Mark MooreStone Tools and Cognition Hub, Archaeology and Palaeoanthropology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
SuryatmanBalai Arkeologi Sulawesi Selatan, Makassar, Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Michelle LangleyAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Budianto HakimBalai Arkeologi Sulawesi Selatan, Makassar, Sulawesi, Indonesia.
Adhi Agus OktavianaPlace Evolution and Rock Art Heritage Unit, Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Adam BrummAustralian Research Centre for Human Evolution, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Griffith University · AUBalai Arkeologi Sulawesi Selatan · IDUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The archaeology of Sulawesi is important for developing an understanding of human dispersal and occupation of central Island Southeast Asia. Through over a century of archaeological work, multiple human populations in the southwestern region of Sulawesi have been identified, the most well-documented being that of the Mid- to Late Holocene 'Toalean' technological period. Archaeological models for this period describe a population with a strong cultural identity, subdivided into groups living on the coastal plains around Maros as well as dispersed upland forest dwellers, hunting endemic wildlife with bow-and-arrow technology. It has been proposed that the Toaleans were capable of vast water-crossings, with possible cultural exchange with northern Australia, Java, and Japan. This Toalean paradigm is built almost exclusively on existing interpretations of distinctive Toalean stone and bone artefact technologies, constructed on out-dated 19th and 20th century theory. Moreover, current definitions of Toalean artefact types are inconsistently applied and unsystematic, and the manufacturing sequence has historically been poorly understood. To address these problems in existing artefact models and typologies, we present a clarified typology of the Toalean artefacts of South Sulawesi, and describe the technical aspects of artefact production. This typology provides a tool for standardising research and will facilitate more meaningful assessments of material culture repertoires and more reliable assessment of spatial and temporal changes for the region.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyArtifactsAustraliaBone and BonesFossilsHumansIndonesiaJapanTechnology

Identifiers

PMID34038416
PMCPMC8153489
OpenAlexW3165873894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.