Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038264›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2022

Examination of Breast Cancer Screening Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs among Syrian Refugee Women in a Western Canadian Province.

Louise Racine, Isil Andsoy, Sithokozile Maposa, Hassanali Vatanparast, Susan Fowler-Kerry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Factors related to clinical breast examination: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louise RacineCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2670-7667
Isil AndsoyDepartment of Nursing, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey.
Sithokozile MaposaCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Prince Albert, Canada.
Hassanali VatanparastCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Susan Fowler-KerryCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-1932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen living in the Arab world present low breast cancer screening rates, delayed diagnosis, and higher mortality rates. PURPOSE: To further explore the Muslim Syrian refugee women's breast self-examination (BSE), utilization of clinical breast examination (CBE) and mammography.

methodsA cross-sectional descriptive exploratory study design was used. The sample consisted of 75 refugee women. Data were collected using Champion's Health Belief Model Scale, the Cancer Stigma Scale, and the Arab Culture-Specific Barriers to Breast Cancer Questionnaire. Descriptive, Pearson correlation and logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data.

resultsA minority of women had BSE (32%), CBE (12%) and mammograms (6.7%) anytime during their lifetime. Women's breast cancer screening (BCS) knowledge ranked at a medium level (M = 10.57, SD = 0.40). Low knowledge score, BSE information, policy opposition, responsibility, barriers to BSE, and seriousness were found to be statistically significant in women's BSE practice. BSE benefits and religious beliefs significantly predict CBE Age, education, knowledge, responsibility, susceptibility, social barriers, and religious beliefs were statistically significant in women's mammography use (p < .01).

conclusionsParticipants' breast cancer screening practices were low. Health beliefs, Arab culture and stigma about cancer affected women's BCS practices. Faith-based interventions may improve knowledge and practices.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRefugeesCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMammographySurveys and QuestionnairesSyriaBreast cancer screeningbreast cancer self-examinationhealth beliefs modelmammogramsSyrian refugee women

Identifiers

PMID34038264
PMCPMC9109584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.