Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34038035›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2021

Risk awareness during operation of analytical flow cytometers and implications throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Avrill Aspland, Claude Chew, Iyadh Douagi, Tessa Galland, James Marvin, Josh Monts, Dayton Nance, Adrian L Smith, Michael Solga

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of Biocontainment Efficacy and Flow Cytometric Impact of a Novel Platform in High Containment Laboratories.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Practicalities of Cell Sorting.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Avrill AsplandSydney Cytometry Core Research Facility, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-0645
Claude ChewFlow Cytometry Core Facility, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Iyadh DouagiFlow Cytometry Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tessa GallandFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Health Science Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
James MarvinFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Health Science Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Josh MontsFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Health Science Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Dayton NanceFlow Cytometry Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Adrian L SmithSydney Cytometry Core Research Facility, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Michael SolgaFlow Cytometry Core Facility, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Utah · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Infectious Diseases Research Technologies Core - BethesdaZICAI001051 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CHERRY, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$226.1M
COVID-19 Instrumentation in the RTBZICAI001313 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CHERRY, JAMES · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIC AI001313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought biosafety to the forefront of many life sciences. The outbreak has compelled research institutions to re-evaluate biosafety practices and potential at-risk areas within research laboratories and more specifically within Shared Resource Laboratories (SRLs). In flow cytometry facilities, biological safety assessment encompasses known hazards based on the biological sample and associated risk group, as well as potential or unknown hazards, such as aerosol generation and instrument "failure modes." Cell sorting procedures undergo clearly defined biological safety assessments and adhere to well-established biosafety guidelines that help to protect SRL staff and users against aerosol exposure. Conversely, benchtop analyzers are considered low risk due to their low sample pressure and enclosed fluidic systems, although there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption of low risk. To investigate this, we evaluated several regions on analyzers using the Cyclex-d microsphere assay, a recently established method for cell sorter aerosol containment testing. We found that aerosol and/or droplet hazards were detected on all benchtop analyzers predominantly during operation in "failure modes." These results indicate that benchtop analytical cytometers present a more complicated set of risks than are commonly appreciated.

Indexed as

Containment of BiohazardsLaboratory PersonnelOccupational HealthAerosolsCell SeparationCOVID-19Equipment ContaminationFlow CytometryHumansOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAerosolsaerosolsbiosafety guidelinesCore LaboratoryCOVID‐19flow cytometrypandemicrisk assessmentSARS‐CoV‐2Shared Resource LaboratorySRL

Identifiers

PMID34038035
PMCPMC10493867
OpenAlexW3111953852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.