ArticleJAMA network open2021
Assessment of the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Pediatric Tertiary Care Setting.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Implementation of a Pharmacogenomic Service in a Pediatric Community Hospital.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026Article
- Genome Sequencing Enhances Precision and Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenetic Data Compared to Arrays.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenetics in pediatric cardiology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Implementation of preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: progress, puzzles and priorities from an implementation science perspective.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenomic Drug-Gene Interactions in Geriatric Emergency Department Patients Who Sustained Falls: A Pilot Study.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.HGG advances · 2025Article
- Analyzing pharmacogenetics cost effectiveness and savings across common health conditions in the United States.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Review
- Clinician Experiences at the Frontier of Pharmacogenomics and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- CYP2C19 point-of-care testing: where are we now and where should we go?The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Review
- Implementing CYP2C19-guided clopidogrel therapy: a scoping review of pharmacogenomic testing services.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Article
- Implementation of genetic testing for heritable cardiac conditions: A scoping review.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Review
- QPGx-CARES: Qatar pharmacogenetics clinical applications and research enhancement strategies.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
- A review of real-world evidence on preemptive pharmacogenomic testing for preventing adverse drug reactions: a reality for future health care.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Review
- A call for increased inclusivity and global representation in pharmacogenetic testing.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Opportunities for Pharmacogenetic Testing to Guide Dosing of Medications in Youths With Medicaid.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Urgent call for guidance supporting gene-based drug dosing in children and adolescents.Paediatrics & child health · 2023Article
- Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Pharmacogenetic profiling via genome sequencing in children with medical complexity.Pediatric research · 2023Article
- Identifying the prevalence of clinically actionable drug-gene interactions in a health system biorepository to guide pharmacogenetics implementation services.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing provides preemptive pharmacotherapeutic guidance regarding the lack of therapeutic benefit or adverse drug reactions of PGx targeted drugs. Pharmacogenomic information is of particular value among children with complex medical conditions who receive multiple medications and are at higher risk of developing adverse drug reactions. Objectives: To assess the implementation outcomes of a PGx testing program comprising both a point-of-care model that examined targeted drugs and a preemptive model informed by whole-genome sequencing that evaluated a broad range of drugs for potential therapy among children in a pediatric tertiary care setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, from January 2017 to September 2020. Pharmacogenomic analyses were performed among 172 children who were categorized into 2 groups: a point-of-care cohort and a preemptive cohort. The point-of-care cohort comprised 57 patients referred to the consultation clinic for planned therapy with PGx targeted drugs and/or for adverse drug reactions, including lack of therapeutic benefit, after the receipt of current or past medications. The preemptive cohort comprised 115 patients who received exploratory whole-genome sequencing-guided PGx testing for their heart conditions from the cardiac genome clinic at the Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research. Exposures: Patients received PGx analysis of whole-genome sequencing data and/or multiplex genotyping of 6 pharmacogenes (CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, VKORC1, and TPMT) that have established PGx clinical guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The number of patients for whom PGx test results warranted deviation from standard dosing regimens. Results: A total of 172 children (mean [SD] age, 8.5 [5.6] years; 108 boys [62.8%]) were enrolled in the study. In the point-of-care cohort, a median of 2 target genes (range, 1-5 genes) were investigated per individual, with CYP2C19 being the most frequently examined; genotypes in 21 of 57 children (36.8%) were incompatible with standard treatment regimens. As expected from population allelic frequencies, among the 115 children in the whole-genome sequencing-guided preemptive cohort, 92 children (80.0%) were recommended to receive nonstandard treatment regimens for potential drug therapies based on their 6-gene pharmacogenetic profile. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, among both the point-of-care and preemptive cohorts, the multiplex PGx testing program provided dosing recommendations that deviated from standard regimens at an overall rate that was similar to the population frequencies of relevant variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.