Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2021
Effects of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on speech.
Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Impact of Clear Aligners and Traditional Fixed Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Adverse effects of removable orthodontic aligners: A systematic review with single-arm meta-analysis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial.Brazilian oral research · 2025Trial
- Comparison of the effect of clear twin block and traditional twin block on speech: a randomized clinical trial.The Angle orthodontist · 2024Trial
- Article
- Impact of orthodontic appliances on patients' daily lives: a comparison between clear aligners and fixed appliances.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Review
- Patient experiences with clear aligners: a scoping review.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Clear Aligner Treatment: Indications, Advantages, and Adverse Effects-A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Orthodontic Risk Perspectives among Orthodontists during Treatment: A Descriptive Pilot Study in Greece and Slovakia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clear aligner therapy versus conventional brackets: Oral impacts over time.Dental research journal · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Screening of fluoride analysis as a biochemical parameter in the orthodontic treatment using fixed appliances.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Clear Aligners in Patients with Amelogenesis and Dentinogenesis Imperfecta.International journal of dentistry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate effects of orthodontic treatment with aligners and conventional fixed appliances on production of speech. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. Patients with Angle Class I malocclusion, moderate crowding, and no speech impairment were randomly allocated to two groups: patients with orthodontic aligners (OAs; n = 20; mean age = 23.60 ± 5.65 years) and those with conventional fixed appliances (n = 20; mean age = 20.56 ± 4.51 years) and treated at the University of North Parana's clinic in Londrina, Brazil. Evaluation of speech production was performed semiobjectively by a speech therapist (myofunctional orofacial examination) and subjectively (self-assessment) at five time points: baseline, immediately after insertion of appliances, and subsequently at 3, 30, and 180 days after insertion. For intergroup comparison, independent t, χ2, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were used; for intragroup comparison, the Friedman test was applied (α = 5%).
resultsIn the semiobjective evaluation, patients with OAs exhibited a change in production of speech production, compared with patients with fixed appliances, immediately and 3 days after insertion of appliances (P < .001). Thirty days after insertion, the groups were similar (P = .487), an outcome that was unchanged at 180 days. However, in the self-assessments, patients in both groups reported significant speech difficulties immediately and 3 days after insertion of appliances, but such impairment was no longer perceived at 30 days or 180 days.
conclusionsAlthough the speech therapist identified changes in speech production at the start of treatment in the OA group only, patient self-assessments demonstrated that orthodontic treatment, regardless of the type of appliance used, interfered with their perception of speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.