Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34037286›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2021

Early Weight Loss as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: Analyses from REGARD, RAINBOW, and RAINFALL Phase III Studies.

Wasat Mansoor, Eric J Roeland, Aafia Chaudhry, Astra M Liepa, Ran Wei, Holly Knoderer, Paolo Abada, Anindya Chatterjee, Samuel J Klempner

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Body weight loss as a prognostic and predictive factor in previously treated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III TAGS trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patient metabolic profile defined by liver and muscleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Dietary intake of vitamin C and gastric cancer: a pooled analysis within the Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Physical Resilience as a Predictor of Lifespan and Late-Life Health in Genetically Heterogeneous Mice.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. German, Austrian, and Swiss guidelines for systemic treatment of gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical Management of Gastric Cancer Treatment Regimens.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2023
    Article
  18. Does immunotherapy change the treatment paradigm in metastatic gastric cancer?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wasat MansoorThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-4934
Eric J RoelandMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aafia ChaudhryEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Astra M LiepaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ran WeiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Holly KnodererEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Paolo AbadaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Anindya ChatterjeeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Samuel J KlempnerMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight loss is common in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA); however, the prognostic implications of weight loss during the first cycle (C1) of chemotherapy remain poorly characterized. In this study, we investigated the impact of early weight loss during systemic treatment as a potential prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced G/GEA. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of three phase III studies of ramucirumab. Patients were categorized into two groups: weight loss of ≥3% and <3% based on weight change during C1 (3-4 weeks) of treatment. OS by weight groups was assessed for each study and as a pooled meta-analysis. The effect of C1 weight change on patient survival was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.

resultsA total of 1,464 patients with weight data at the end of C1 were analyzed: REGARD (n = 311), RAINBOW (n = 591), and RAINFALL (n = 562). For all three studies, there were fewer patients in the weight loss ≥3% than <3% group. OS was numerically shorter for patients with weight loss of ≥3% than for patients with weight loss of <3% during C1 irrespective of treatment arm. Similar treatment independent effects of early weight loss on OS were observed in the meta-analysis. Overall, early weight loss ≥3% was associated with shorter survival in patients receiving active drug as well as placebo/best supportive care.

conclusionThis large post hoc analysis demonstrated that weight loss of ≥3% during C1 was a negative prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced G/GEA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This comprehensive analysis examining early weight loss during systemic treatment as a predictor of survival outcomes in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA) includes a large sample size, reliable on-treatment data reported in well-conducted phase III clinical trials, and global representation of cancer patients with advanced G/GEA. Understanding the impact of on-treatment weight loss is clinically relevant and may represent an opportunity for targeted interventions.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEsophagogastric JunctionHumansPaclitaxelPrognosisWeight LossPaclitaxelGastric cancerGastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA)NutritionRamucirumabWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID34037286
PMCPMC8417853
OpenAlexW3165371223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.