Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34037281›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2021

Can dynamic occupancy models improve predictions of species' range dynamics? A test using Swiss birds.

Natalie J Briscoe, Damaris Zurell, Jane Elith, Christian König, Guillermo Fandos, Anne-Kathleen Malchow, Marc Kéry, Hans Schmid, Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Providing regular and frequent maps of losses and gains of farmland birds based on European monitoring data.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial distribution dynamics forEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Demography-environment relationships improve mechanistic understanding of range dynamics under climate change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natalie J BriscoeSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-8956
Damaris ZurellGeography Dept., Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-3558
Jane ElithSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8706-0326
Christian KönigGeography Dept., Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-5983
Guillermo FandosGeography Dept., Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-9444
Anne-Kathleen MalchowGeography Dept., Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-6365
Marc KérySwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Hans SchmidSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.
Gurutzeta Guillera-ArroitaSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-5739

Funding

Australia-Germany Joint Research Co-operation Scheme grant 57445394Australian Research Council DP180101852German Science Foundation DFG ZU 361/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictions of species' current and future ranges are needed to effectively manage species under environmental change. Species ranges are typically estimated using correlative species distribution models (SDMs), which have been criticized for their static nature. In contrast, dynamic occupancy models (DOMs) explicitily describe temporal changes in species' occupancy via colonization and local extinction probabilities, estimated from time series of occurrence data. Yet, tests of whether these models improve predictive accuracy under current or future conditions are rare. Using a long-term data set on 69 Swiss birds, we tested whether DOMs improve the predictions of distribution changes over time compared to SDMs. We evaluated the accuracy of spatial predictions and their ability to detect population trends. We also explored how predictions differed when we accounted for imperfect detection and parameterized models using calibration data sets of different time series lengths. All model types had high spatial predictive performance when assessed across all sites (mean AUC > 0.8), with flexible machine learning SDM algorithms outperforming parametric static and DOMs. However, none of the models performed well at identifying sites where range changes are likely to occur. In terms of estimating population trends, DOMs performed best, particularly for species with strong population changes and when fit with sufficient data, while static SDMs performed very poorly. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering what aspects of performance matter most when selecting a modelling method for a particular application and the need for further research to improve model utility. While DOMs show promise for capturing range dynamics and inferring population trends when fitted with sufficient data, computational constraints on variable selection and model fitting can lead to reduced spatial accuracy of predictions, an area warranting more attention.

Indexed as

BirdsEcosystemAnimalsModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsSwitzerlanddetection probabilitymodel evaluationmultiseason occupancy modelspredictive performancespecies distribution modelsspecies trends

Identifiers

PMID34037281
PMCPMC13420806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.