ALIGNING VIDEO-AND STRUCTURED DATA FOR IMAGING OPTIMISATION.

Jonas Ivarsson, Anja Almén, Mårten Falkenberg, Charlotta Lundh, Magnus Båth

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas IvarssonDepartment of Applied IT, University of Göteborg, SE-412 96, Göteborg, Sweden.

Anja AlménDepartment of Radiation Protection, Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, SE-171 16, Stockholm, Sweden.

Mårten FalkenbergDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45, Göteborg, Sweden.

Charlotta LundhDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Göteborg Sweden.

Magnus BåthDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-413 45, Göteborg Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2015-03621

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging optimisation can benefit from combining structured data with qualitative data in the form of audio and video recordings. Since video is complex to work with, there is a need to find a workable solution that minimises the additional time investment. The purpose of the paper is to outline a general workflow that can begin to address this issue. What is described is a data management process comprising the three steps of collection, mining and contextualisation. This process offers a way to work systematically and at a large scale without succumbing to the context loss of statistical methods. The proposed workflow effectively combines the video and structured data to enable a new level of insights in the optimisation process.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID34037218

DOI10.1093/rpd/ncab071

PMCPMC8507456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.