Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036802›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Complexity and diversity of motion amplification and control strategies in motile carnivorous plant traps.

Ulrike Bauer, Ulrike K Müller, Simon Poppinga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Carnivorous Plants as Model Species for Recent and Further Studies.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Chemonastic Stalked Glands in the Carnivorous Rainbow PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The cracking of Scots pine (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Shapeshifting in the Venus flytrap (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulrike BauerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ulrike K MüllerDepartment of Biology, California State University Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
Simon PoppingaPlant Biomechanics Group, Botanic Garden, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similar to animals, plants have evolved mechanisms for elastic energy storage and release to power and control rapid motion, yet both groups have been largely studied in isolation. This is exacerbated by the lack of consistent terminology and conceptual frameworks describing elastically powered motion in both groups. Iconic examples of fast movements can be found in carnivorous plants, which have become important models to study biomechanics, developmental processes, evolution and ecology. Trapping structures and processes vary considerably between different carnivorous plant groups. Using snap traps, suction traps and springboard-pitfall traps as examples, we illustrate how traps mix and match various mechanisms to power, trigger and actuate motions that contribute to prey capture, retention and digestion. We highlight a fundamental trade-off between energetic investment and movement control and discuss it in a functional-ecological context.

Indexed as

Carnivorous PlantMovementAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaMotionPlantscost-benefit analysispitfall trapplant movementprey capturesnap trapsuction trap

Identifiers

PMID34036802
PMCPMC8150269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.