Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036646›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2021

Trade-offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on "Environmental DNA: What's behind the term?" by Pawlowski et al., (2020).

Naiara Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, Olivier Morissette, Colin W Bean, Shivakumara Manu, Pritam Banerjee, Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel, Kingsly C Beng, S Elizabeth Alter, Fabian Roger, Luke E Holman and 16 more

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Potential Role of Photochemistry in Environmental DNA Degradation.Environmental science & technology letters · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Naiara Rodriguez-EzpeletaAZTI Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Marine Research, Sukarrieta, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-6755
Olivier MorissetteDirection de l'expertise sur la Faune Aquatique, Ministère des Forêt de la Faune et des Parcs, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-9093
Colin W BeanScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Shivakumara ManuLaboratory for the Conservation of Endangered Species, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9114-8793
Pritam BanerjeeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Anaïs Lacoursière-RousselGovernment of Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. Andrews Biological Station, St. Andrews, NB, Canada.
Kingsly C BengDepartment of Ecosystem Research, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany.
S Elizabeth AlterDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, USA.
Fabian RogerCentre for Environmental and Climate Research (CEC), Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9865-7542
Luke E HolmanSchool of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Kathryn A StewartInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6132-6627
Michael T MonaghanDepartment of Ecosystem Research, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany.
Quentin MauvisseauNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1215-2987
Luca MiriminDepartment of Natural Sciences, School of Science and Computing, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, Galway, Ireland.
Owen S WangensteenNorwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Caterina M AntognazzaDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Sarah J HelyarInstitute of Global Food Security (IGFS), School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1600-997X
Hugo de BoerNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marie-Eve MonchampDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Reindert NijlandMarine Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-3768
Cathryn L AbbottPacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
Hideyuki DoiGraduate School of Simulation Studies, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2701-3982
Matthew A BarnesDepartment of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-8587
Matthieu LeraySmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Smithsonian Institution, Panama City, Panama.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-1878
Pascal I HablützelFlanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Ostend, Belgium.
Kristy DeinerDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-3223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent paper, "Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring," Pawlowski et al. argue that the term eDNA should be used to refer to the pool of DNA isolated from environmental samples, as opposed to only extra-organismal DNA from macro-organisms. We agree with this view. However, we are concerned that their proposed two-level terminology specifying sampling environment and targeted taxa is overly simplistic and might hinder rather than improve clear communication about environmental DNA and its use in biomonitoring. This terminology is based on categories that are often difficult to assign and uninformative, and it overlooks a fundamental distinction within eDNA: the type of DNA (organismal or extra-organismal) from which ecological interpretations are derived.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversityDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNADNA, Environmentalclear terminologyecology of eDNAextra-organismal DNAorganismal DNA

Identifiers

PMID34036646
PMCPMC8698002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.