ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021
A single setup approach for the MRI-based measurement and validation of the transfer function of elongated medical implants.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A single setup approach for the MRI-based measurement and validation of the transfer function of elongated medical implants.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo propose a single setup using the MRI to both measure and validate the transfer function (TF) of linear implants. Conventionally, the TF of an implant is measured in one bench setup and validated using another.
methodsIt has been shown that the TF can be measured using MRI. To validate this measurement, the implant is exposed to different incident electric fields, while the temperature increase at the tip is monitored. For a good validation, the incident electric fields that the implant is exposed to should be orthogonal. We perform a simulation study on six different methods that change the incident electric field. Afterward, a TF measurement and validation study using the best method from the simulations is performed. This is done with fiberoptic temperature probes at 1.5 T for four linear implant structures using the proposed single setup.
resultsThe simulation study showed that positioning local transmit coils at different locations along the lead trajectory has a similar validation quality compared with changing the implant trajectory (ie, the conventional validation method). For the validation study that was performed, an R
conclusionA single setup to both measure and validate the transfer function using local transmit coils has been shown to work. The benefits of using the proposed validation method are that there is only one setup required instead of two and the implant trajectory is not varied; therefore, the relative distance between the leap tip and the temperature probe is constant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.