Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036519›Full record

Trial reportHepatology international2021

Comparison of 5% human albumin and normal saline for fluid resuscitation in sepsis induced hypotension among patients with cirrhosis (FRISC study): a randomized controlled trial.

Cyriac Abby Philips, Rakhi Maiwall, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Ankur Jindal, Ashok Kumar Choudhury, Guresh Kumar, Ankit Bhardwaj, Lalita Gouri Mitra, Prashant Mohan Agarwal, Shiv Kumar Sarin

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hepatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Albumin for people with liver cirrhosis and bacterial infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cyriac Abby PhilipsDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India.
Rakhi MaiwallDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India.
Manoj Kumar SharmaDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India.
Ankur JindalDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India.
Ashok Kumar ChoudhuryDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India.
Guresh KumarDepartment of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India.
Ankit BhardwajDepartment of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India.
Lalita Gouri MitraDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India.
Prashant Mohan AgarwalDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India.
Shiv Kumar SarinDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 1100071, India. shivsarin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-5610
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSepsis and septic shock are common causes of hospitalization and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. There is no data on the choice of fluid and resuscitation protocols in sepsis-induced hypotension in cirrhosis.

methodsIn this open-label trial conducted at a single center, we enrolled 308 cirrhotics with sepsis-induced hypotension and randomized them to receive either 5% albumin or normal saline. The primary endpoint was a reversal of hypotension [mean arterial pressure, MAP, ≥ 65 mmHg] at 3 h. Secondary endpoints included serial effects on heart rate, arterial lactate and urine output.

results154 patients each received 5% albumin (males, 79.8%, mean MAP 52.9 ± 7.0 mm Hg) or 0.9% saline (85.1%, 53.4 ± 6.3 mm Hg) with comparable baseline parameters and liver disease severity. Reversal of hypotension was higher in patients receiving 5% albumin than saline at the end of one hour [25.3% and 11.7%, p = 0.03, Odds ratio (95% CI)-1.9 (1.08-3.42)] and at the end of three hours [11.7% and 3.2%, p = 0.008, 3.9 (1.42-10.9)]. Sustained reduction in heart rate and hyperlactatemia (p < 0.001) was better in the albumin group. At one week, the proportion of patients surviving was higher in the albumin group than those receiving saline (43.5% vs 38.3%, p = 0.03). Female gender and SOFA ≥ 11 were predictors of non-response to fluid.

conclusions5% human albumin is safe and beneficial in reversing sepsis-induced hypotension compared to normal saline in patients with cirrhosis improving clinically assessable parameters of systemic hemodynamics, tissue perfusion and in-hospital short-term survival of cirrhosis patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

Hypotension, ControlledSepsisFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleSaline SolutionSerum Albumin, HumanSaline SolutionSerum Albumin, HumanAKIColloidCrystalloidCTPICUIntensive careMELDPortal hypertensionShockSOFA

Identifiers

PMID34036519
OpenAlexW3164558140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.