Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036489›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2021

Impact of Circulating and Tissue Biomarkers in Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Melanoma: Ready for Prime Time?

Alice Indini, Fausto Roila, Francesco Grossi, Daniela Massi, Mario Mandalà

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Biomarkers in adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of melanoma].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: 5-Year Efficacy and Biomarker Results from CheckMate 238.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  4. PD-1 Monotherapy Reigns Supreme in Adjuvant Melanoma…But for How Long?Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alice IndiniMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Fausto RoilaUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Francesco GrossiUnit of Medical Oncology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Università dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Daniela MassiSection of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Mario MandalàUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgery and Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. mario.mandala@unipg.it.
University of Perugia · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma has substantially improved over the last years with the advent of novel treatment strategies, mainly immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Given the survival benefit provided in the metastatic setting and the evidence from prospective clinical trials in the early stages, these drugs have been introduced as adjuvant therapies for high-risk resected stage III disease. Several studies have also investigated immune checkpoint inhibitors, as well as BRAF and MEK inhibitors, for neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk stage III melanoma, with preliminary evidence suggesting this could be a very promising approach in this setting. However, even with new strategies, the risk of disease recurrence varies widely among stage III patients, and no available biomarkers for predicting disease recurrence have been established to date. Improved risk stratification is particularly relevant in this setting to avoid unnecessary treatment for patients who have minimum risk of disease recurrence and to reduce toxicities and costs. Research for predictive and prognostic biomarkers in this setting is ongoing to potentially shed light on the complex interplay between the tumor and the host immune system, and to further personalize treatment. This review provides an insight into available data on circulating and tissue biomarkers, including the tumor microenvironment and associated gene signatures, and their predictive and prognostic role during neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for cutaneous high-risk melanoma patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Decision-MakingClinical Trials as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalHumansMelanomaNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient SelectionPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSkinSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34036489
PMCPMC8200339
OpenAlexW3164024551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.