Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036467›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of epidemiology2021

The association between meat and fish consumption and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies.

Mostafa Dianatinasab, Anke Wesselius, Tessa de Loeij, Amin Salehi-Abargouei, Evan Y W Yu, Mohammad Fararouei, Maree Brinkman, Piet van den Brandt, Emily White, Elisabete Weiderpass and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Mostafa DianatinasabDepartment of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel40 (RoomC5.570), 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Anke WesseliusDepartment of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel40 (RoomC5.570), 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands. anke.wesselius@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-9665
Tessa de LoeijDepartment of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel40 (RoomC5.570), 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Amin Salehi-AbargoueiNutrition and Food Security Research Center, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Evan Y W YuDepartment of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel40 (RoomC5.570), 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mohammad FararoueiDepartment of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maree BrinkmanDepartment of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel40 (RoomC5.570), 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Piet van den BrandtDepartment of Epidemiology, Schools for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Emily WhiteFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elisabete WeiderpassInternational Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Florence Le Calvez-KelmInternational Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Marc J GunterInternational Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Inge HuybrechtsInternational Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Fredrik LiedbergDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Guri SkeieDepartment of Community Medicine, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Anne TjonnelandDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elio RiboliDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Maurice P ZeegersDepartment of Complex Genetics and Epidemiology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel40 (RoomC5.570), 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRCancer Council Victoria · AUFred Hutch Cancer Center · USImperial College London · GBLund University · SEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence on the effects of meat consumption from different sources on the risk of bladder cancer (BC) is limited and controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the associations between meat consumption and BC risk using a pooled data approach. Individual data from 11 prospective cohorts comprising 2848 BC cases and 515,697 non-cases with a total of 5,498,025 person-years of follow-up was pooled and analysed to investigate the potential associations between total red meat and products, red meat, processed meat, poultry and total fish and BC risk. Hazard ratios (HRs), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were estimated using Cox regression models stratified on cohort. Overall, an increased BC risk was found for high intake of organ meat (HR comparing highest with lowest tertile: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.36, p-trend = 0.03). On the contrary, a marginally inverse association was observed for total fish intake and BC risk among men (HR comparing highest with lowest tertile: 0.79, 95% CI 0.65, 0.97, p-trend = 0.04). No associations were observed for other meat sources. Results of this prospective study suggest that organ meat consumption may be associated with BC development. Replication in large-scale prospective studies and investigation of possible causal mechanisms is needed.

Indexed as

FishesAdultAnimalsCohort StudiesHumansMaleProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRed MeatRisk FactorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBladder cancerEpidemiologyFishMeatRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID34036467
PMCPMC8416827
OpenAlexW3165292820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.