ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021
Molecular theory considering nuclear potential wells.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building a new reasonable molecular theoryJournal of molecular modeling · 2024Article
- Building a new reasonable atomic theory.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Atomic excited states and the related energy levels.Journal of molecular modeling · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces potential wells around nuclei and their roles in chemical bonds. The approach uses one-electron Bohr atomic model concept. Multi-electron atoms are converted to one-electron atoms by grounding all inactive, non-reacting electrons using the Apparent Nuclear Charge (ANC) and Electron Shielding Effect (ESE) concepts introduced in earlier publications. Then, the resulting two one-electron atoms and their potential wells are utilized to obtain the related chemical bond length. The methodology is applicable to all elements of periodic table without a need for any additional tool. To test the concept, calculated bond lengths were compared to experimental ones for about 90 different bonds, which showed an average error of less than 5%. The article discusses some nontraditional views for chemical bonds which may contradict the traditional beliefs in chemistry. Hopefully, readers would consider the calculated results in support of the presented views. Attached to this article is a computer software program which was prepared with sample input and output files for readers. The software can be utilized to obtain any interested bond length. The software is applicable to all elements in the periodic table up to the element Hassium with the atomic number of 108. Nuclear potential well associated with the electron of hydrogen atom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34036421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.