Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036403›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in higher pain levels compared to the cemented technique: a prospective register study.

Tone Gifstad, Jørgen Jebens Nordskar, Tarjei Egeberg, Tina Strømdal Wik, Siri Bjørgen Winther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Observation of analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for local infiltration anesthesia in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tone GifstadDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trondheim University Hospital, Postbox 3250, NO 7006, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway. tone.gifstad@stolav.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4060-9684
Jørgen Jebens NordskarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trondheim University Hospital, Postbox 3250, NO 7006, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway.
Tarjei EgebergDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trondheim University Hospital, Postbox 3250, NO 7006, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway.
Tina Strømdal WikDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trondheim University Hospital, Postbox 3250, NO 7006, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway.
Siri Bjørgen WintherDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Center, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, the preferred fixation method for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has changed from cemented to cementless. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from the cemented versus cementless techniques two- and twelve-months post-operation.

methodsFrom 2015 to 2019, 187 cemented and 261 cementless UKAs were included based on an institutional registry. The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee System™ (Zimmer Biomet, Bridgend, United Kingdom) was used for all patients. Three experienced surgeons performed all procedures. Data were collected pre- and peroperatively, and at two- and twelve-months postoperatively. PROMs included pain (evaluated on a numeric rating scale [NRS] during activity and at rest), and knee function (evaluated with the disease-specific short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS-PS]). Patients also rated postoperative joint function (better, unchanged, uncertain or worse) and were asked, "based on your experience to date, would you go through the surgery again?". Duration of surgery was noted and revisions during the first post-operative year were evaluated.

resultsThe cemented group reported significantly lower activity-related pain at both two- and twelve-month follow-up. This was also the case for pain at rest at twelve-month follow-up, and KOOS-PS at two-month follow-up. Duration of surgery (adjusted for surgeon differences) was eight minutes less on average with the cementless technique. Eleven prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) were found following the cementless fixation technique compared to three using the cemented implant.

conclusionUKA cases with cemented implants had lower pain scores during activity two and twelve months after surgery compared with those who had cementless implants. Differences in favor of the cemented group were also found for pain at rest one year after surgery and for KOOS-PS two months after. Surgery was significantly shorter in duration in the cementless group, but a relatively high number of PJIs were found in that same group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeBone CementsHumansKnee JointPainProsthesis DesignTreatment OutcomeBone CementsCementedCementlessFixation techniquePROMsRegistryUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34036403
PMCPMC9309142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.